Letter Re: Test Sources for Radiation Meters--The Cesium Source Already in Your Home

Permalink | Print

Mr. Rawles:
The following is an excerpt from an interesting string of conversation on Survival Forum about calibrating a survey meter. I don't know this as fact, but if true. It would useful info. I should say that the poster that posted this has been reliable in the past, and well-documented.

I asked Ole Rad 'bout the calibration of me CD 777-2 survey meter. Says he-- "1 microcurie of Cesium 137 should cause a defection." Purty cool, huh? Turns out 1 microcurie source of Cesium 137 is a common smoke detector-- that only took me two days ta find out. So's I load the ole D battery , which falls out of the battery holder in a CD777-2 without taping the battery in place.Set the scale for the lowest setting and zero the thing-circuit test gives a full deflection. Cool, huh? So's I take the meter out of its box and touch the chamber to the smoke detector little black box of cesium and -- I get a needle deflection of one mark-- that would be 1 microcurie. The durn thing is still in calibration and working fine.Only took me two days to figure out. Da**it, Rad-- why didn't ya say what a 1 microcurie Cesium 137 source was? I was ready to order some bag of ore or sumthin and I had the source to check me meter right on my wall.

Again, great blog. I will be praying about your change in employment. Regards, - C.K.

All Content on This Web Site Copyright 2005-2013 All Rights Reserved - James Wesley, Rawles - SurvivalBlog.com

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jim Rawles published on April 8, 2006 11:07 PM.

Letter Re: Suggestions for the Acute Management of a H5N1 Pandemic, by Spencer Feldman was the previous entry in this blog.

Note from JWR: is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

Visitor Map

Map

Statistics

counter customisable
Unique visits since July 2005. More than 300,000 unique visits per week.