The recent school shooting at Virginia Tech demonstrates a huge underlying
societal problem that many of us are either ignoring or are ignorant of. Because
society has spent much of the last several decades trying to stamp violence
out of schools and out of our children, we end up with kids who are made-to-order
victims that will line up to be shot execution style rather than fight back.
The answer to school violence is not to arm the campus police, have campus
SWAT teams, or class rooms that can double as fortresses, it is to teach our
children to protect themselves aggressively and confidently with whatever weapon
may be at hand. Clearly the schools are not doing this, so responsible parents
need to be sure they are.
While it may be politically incorrect to say so, how many of us have wondered
why the 30 college kids in a classroom didn't mob the gunman, tackle him, hit
him with a chair, or otherwise fight back? Why was the only defender a concentration
camp survivor old enough to be the students' grandparent? I believe that the
answer to those two questions is the same: Because in two generations our feel
good society has gutted the right to self defense in our public schools and
created a generation of victims. That's right – they have brainwashed
our children into pliable victims who will not defend themselves.
Creating Willing Victims
In our school district, kids in middle school and occasionally in lower school
are handcuffed and arrested when a fight breaks out. Because of "zero
tolerance" towards fighting, even kids who defend themselves when attacked
are arrested and suspended, regardless of who was "in the right" or
what witnesses say. The concept that students have a right to self defense
does not exist in these schools and the lesson taught is "do not fight
back." Is it any wonder that kids who are indoctrinated in this system
have no idea how to defend themselves or that it is even permissible to try,
even when faced with a gunman killing their fellow students?
This politically correct emphasis on non-violence is really a drive to non-confrontation
that teaches kids to be victims at an early age. Violence not only still exists
in our schools, it is worse than ever because the system does not allow kids
to counter force with force. This means that kids cannot fight back when they
are harassed on the school bus, spit on in the lunch room, assaulted in the
hallway, or beaten in the locker room. Teachers routinely do not intervene
in bullying or one-way assaults. This bullying behavior is allowed until the
target decides to fight back, at which point school rules treat both
the attacker and defender the same way. I am afraid that these days,
the only place bullies and their victims really meet after school to settle
their differences is on
television or in the movies.
Stamping Out the Competitive Spirit
In addition to creating willing victims who are powerless to defend themselves,
public schools are stamping out the competitive spirit out of our children.
This is terribly unfortunate, because competitiveness and the desire to win
are two of the things that have helped make America great.
In public schools, competitiveness is looked down upon because it might hurt
a less competitive student's self esteem if they don't do as well as someone
else. For the sake of self esteem, standing out must be discouraged and everyone
must be equal – equally bad, that is. (Didn't we fight the Cold War to
keep this communist mentality from spreading? And now it is being enforced
in our schools.)
Public schools are routinely taking those kids who are smarter or otherwise
above average and forcing them to work at the level of the slowest kid in the
class. For example, in my daughter's public elementary school class, smart
children were teamed with slower kids on team projects to bring up the slower
kids' grades up.
This approach is an example of backwards thinking. Instead of allowing kids
to succeed or fail on their own merits, the system promotes mediocrity. Worse,
the smart kids are bored by the slow progress and frustrated at having to do
the teacher's job of instructing the other kids. They also learn early that
by appearing smart, they have to do everyone else's work, and so some decide
to hide their intelligence. The slower kids learn that society will promote
them even when they don't do the work (so called social promotion – don’t
get me started), so there is little incentive for them to try harder or to
improve their performance.
We used to encourage success and honor our high achievers; now the public schools
teach your kids that standing out and excelling is wrong because when you stand
out, someone with a lower average may get their feelings hurt. So much for
pride in a job well done.
This effort to improve children by falsely boosting their self esteem is wishful
thinking. Kids know where they stand regardless of what the teacher says, and
it sends the wrong message when teachers and school officials honor everyone,
regardless of their performance. We need to go back to rewarding the high performers
and addressing the problem with a child who isn't finding success, even if
it means we have to hurt their self esteem by holding them back a grade.
Sports, the Last Bastion of Competition
About the only place in public schools that competition still exists is on
the sports field. In fact, the coach is about the only teacher who can still
yell at kids without a parent calling up and complaining.
But how long will this last? If football were not such an institution and economic
boon for high schools and colleges, I have no doubt "well meaning" school
administrators would have banned it by now. Already, there are fewer hours
of PE class in most schools than ever before. Adults are even interfering with
pick up games at recess by saying that kids can’t pick their own teams
because someone might have their feelings hurt by being selected last. I'm
sure everyone reading this has heard of a school district where dodge ball
has been banned because it is too violent or dangerous. When did we start to
coddle our children so much that getting hit with a big red rubber ball became
something we must protect them from?
In most organized contact sports, you can still hit the other player. As a
coach of a girls soccer for six seasons, let me tell you that it is difficult
to get a young girl to be aggressive on the soccer field. Even by age 7, they
are so indoctrinated in non-violence that they back up or will run away from
a charging player instead of advancing or holding their ground to steal the
ball or disrupt a fast break. The short-term result is that the one or two
aggressive kids dominate play, largely because they are unchallenged. The long-term
result is that later in life the girl will become a woman who shies away from
confrontation and is afraid to stand up for herself. Another ready victim.
Yet even organized sports are changing. At young ages, the parents and coaches
are told not to keep score, because losing may cause a child to lose self esteem.
As if a kid old enough to swing a bat can't keep score! Such behavior on the
part of adults who are supposed to be experts in childhood development is laughable.
Let's face it, in life you will win some, and you will lose some, so the sooner
you learn to be a good sport when you lose, the better off you will be. Pretending
that "everyone wins" also eliminates the life lessons that come from
losing, such as picking yourself up and trying again.
Sports are tough, but so is life. Get used to it young and you will survive
better when you are older. I was knocked unconscious playing "touch" football
in sixth grade. In high school, I broke my leg in a soccer game. (The coach
told me to walk it off, and I tried to.) My younger sister almost lost her
front teeth in a softball game in junior high. (Her braces actually kept them
from getting knocked out – it was the only time she was happy to have
braces.) Were we disillusioned or too dispirited to return to the game? Of
course not. We both overcame these temporary setbacks and continued playing
sports. It's the old getting back up on the horse that threw you idea, which
is an important lesson for success later in life. How will our kids learn perseverance
and to overcome obstacles if we clear all the obstacles out of their way? No
wonder the Virginia Tech victims did not fight back – they had been taught
to wait for someone else to come and solve their problem for them.It's Not
Your Father's School Anymore
When my father went to school during World War II, he and his friends would
often bring their .22 rifles or single shot shotguns to school so they could
shoot rabbits and other small game on the way home. When I went to school in
the 1970s, I remember bringing cap guns to school on Halloween, and I carried
a pocket knife every day after I turned 10. Today, dressing like a cowboy for
Halloween or bringing a pocket knife to school can get you expelled, and don't
even think of bring a .22. Not only will the child be expelled, authorities
will likely charge the parent with a crime, confiscate any weapons in the house,
and restrict their right to own a gun again in the future. My, how times have
changed.
So are schools any safer today than they were 30 or 60 years ago? Of course
not. Just as gun control does not reduce violent in the real world, it does
not reduce it in schools. In fact, there is evidence that concealed carry permits
for teaches and administrators is far more likely to forestall a bloody school
massacres than laws and metal detectors.
I don't have to tell you that we live in a violent world where things are not
fair – perhaps the one lesson that public schools do consistently teach
our youth. Unfortunately, public schools do not teach kids how to counter violence,
how to walk with their head held high, and how to avoid or deal with trouble
before it escalates. Instead, it teaches them to be fearful, to slink around
with their heads hung, and to call an administrator, police officer or other
member of the nanny state when something goes wrong. This curriculum has not
only rendered students powerless and created a generation of easy victims;
it has lead to the type of slaughter we saw earlier this year at Virginia Tech.
Further, I postulate that the zero tolerance policies that force good kids
to be victims rather than fight back cause frustration and suppressed anger
in otherwise normal kids. It is this anger and frustration that causes the
oppressed kids to one day reach the bursting point and bring a gun to school,
seeking to end their torment. We will never know how many kids fantasize – without
taking action – about bringing a gun to school and killing their abusers.
But we do know that school shootings driven by revenge on bullies and tormentors,
such as Columbine, show no sign of abating.
How many adults would allow ourselves to be subjected to verbal, psychological
and physical abuse by our peers for six or eight years? Yet kids from fifth
grade up routinely deal with this kind of abuse at the hands of their fellow
students. Should we really expect high school kids, with their raging hormones
and adolescent angst, to survive years of this daily abuse without cracking?
Maybe this is why the use of antidepressants is so high among teenagers today.
Unfortunately, the policies of feel-good, self-esteem raising, zero-tolerance
school administrations have created a generation of ready-made victims and
a revenge-based school shooting culture that never existed before.
Reversing the Brainwashing
So what can you do to fight this conditioning and brainwashing? My advice is
as follows:
First, enroll your boy or girl, in extracurricular sports as young as possible,
preferably by age six. Sports like football, soccer, basketball, lacrosse,
field hockey, roller hockey and ice hockey are in my opinion better than sports
like golf, tennis and baseball because there is contact and aggressive play
is both encouraged and rewarded. In their lives, your kids will have to face
violence, and learning to face it in the controlled environment of the playing
field is the first step in successfully facing it in an uncontrolled environment.
Contact sports do not teach violence and aggression, but they provide an outlet
for the aggression that the schools otherwise bottle up. Sports also teach
kids how to channel aggression and anger into positive activities.
If finances are an issue, choose soccer over a sport that requires lots of
pads such as football or hockey. You can outfit a youth soccer player for less
than $50.
Second, when time and finances allow, enroll your kids in other extra curricular
activities where they will meet and mingle with kids from other schools, towns
and cultures. As they get older, they will need to have a network of friends
outside of the people they go to school with. This provides an escape; when
everyone at their school knows they did something stupid, the kids from the
next town over will probably have no idea. These extra curricular activities
can be programs that teach valuable and vanishing skills, such as Scouts, junior
shooting competitions, and 4H.
Third, do things with your kids. Spend time with them so they can observe your
behavior in difficult situations and learn by your example. Have dinner with
your children regularly and ask them what they learned at school. If you disagree
with what they were taught, provide your contrasting opinion in a reasonable,
even handed way. Remember, any time spent with them is better than no time.
Use examples from your life to and tell stories with morals. Even a drive to
the store and back gives you time to talk and is better than time spent watching
television or playing video games.
Fourth, try to find other responsible adults for them to spend time with; relatives
who think like you do are a good choice. The more one-on-one time they have
with a right-thinking adult, the better, as that influence will slowly infiltrate,
overcoming the brainwashing and protecting them from it in the future. I say
this from experience, having raised two politically conservative children who
understand the second amendment, regardless of what the school tries to teach
them
Fifth, encourage your children to stand up for themselves and tell your child
that you won't punish them if they fight back and defend themselves. There
is a fine line to walk here, as they must understand that 1) the school will
still punish them, but that you will back them and they will not get in additional
trouble at home. And 2) they can't go around looking for or starting fights.
The other person has to throw the first punch or two, so to speak. In my personal
experience, a good martial arts school can help give kids the confidence and
discipline to walk this line as well as the skills to enforce it.
At the same time you give them permission to fight back, teach them that the
best fight is the one that they avoid. Teach them to not to make enemies – there's
no profit in it and potentially much pain as they will have to see the other
kid every day for the rest of the school year. Teach them to think and reason,
and not react emotionally. Cooler heads do prevail. But teach them that when
a fight cannot be avoided, they need to do whatever it takes to win it clearly
and decisively in a way that discourages re-engagement at a future time.
Sixth, talk about what to do in a school shooting scenario. Don't avoid the
topic or turn off the television – address it, just as you would another
survival situation such as an earthquake or tornado. Discuss when to run, when
to hide,
when to fight back. Discuss what, if anything, the school told them to do and
whether it makes sense. Teach them to be aware of exits and where to sit in
the room. Teach them to look for hiding places and that a table is unlikely
to stop a bullet. They also need to know that that action beats reaction. Demonstrate
how it is harder to hit a moving target than a stationary one. At the same
time, reassure them that while it is very unlikely they will have a school
shooting at their school, it is better to plan ahead of time than to panic.
Finally, if you can afford to do so, get them out of the public schools and
into a good private school. Preferably a small one with class sizes under 20,
where kids will have opportunities to learn at their own pace. Home schooling
is another excellent alternative, and is usually very safe, but unfortunately
is often not an option for single parent households or households in which
both parents work.
Because private schools are expensive and generally do not refund your tuition
if your kid is expelled, parents have a much greater vested interest in keeping
their kids in line and well behaved. This makes a world of difference, as does
having independent administrators who do not need to please an elected official.
The Private School Experience
We chose private school, and after the mortgage, it is our largest single expense.
It also requires that we drop off and pick up our child each day, which required
some scheduling changes as well as some additional dollars for gasoline. We
evaluated several schools before picking what we felt was the best one for
our daughter.
Yes, private schooling required a sacrifice, but in our experience, it is well
worth it. Not only does our daughter get far more individual attention from
teachers that she did in public school, she is encouraged to work ahead in
the book. Rather than be held back by the lowest common denominator, kids in
her school compete to see who can finish the most vocabulary words, math sheets,
and reading assignments in the given time. She is no longer bored in class,
and competition encourages her to push herself harder than the teacher could.
She is much happier and well ahead of where she would have been had she stayed
in private school.
Several of the sports teams are co-educational, so the girls learn to play
with the boys – they have to be aggressive if they want to play. Kids
pick their own teams at recess and make their own rules, often with much healthy
argument
and dissent, yet the teachers usually do not interfere, letting the kids work
out their differences. Yes, the kids get bumps, bruises, and abrasions, but
they wear these playground injuries with nonchalance, just like we did 30 years
ago.
Most refreshing is the attitude of the administrators. I met with an administrator
at my daughter's school to express my concern that she was going to punch an
especially annoying boy if he kept up his inappropriate behavior on the basketball
court. The administrator said "Yes, we are aware of his behavior and are
taking steps to address it. We have discussed at our staff meeting that your
daughter or another child may sock him, and a good number of us think that
it would be well deserved." Imagine that -- a school official acknowledging
that a student had a licking coming and that the school would not punish a
girl for defending herself against his boorish and inappropriate behavior.
In the end, no one punched him because the school and his parents got the problem
under control. But it was a refreshing attitude, and one that could never exist
in our politically correct, zero tolerance, public school child warehousing
system.
Whether you go the private school route, are able to home school or have no
option other than public schooling remember that if you take an active role
in your child's life, your influence and teachings will exceed those of the
most liberal school system. So take the time and teach your child well.
