About .
Advertise .
Affiliates .
Archives .
Asian Avian Flu .
Benefit Auction .
Biographies .
Bookshelf .
Charity .
Contact .
Contest .
Corrosive? .
Derivatives .
Email Us .
FAQs .
Glossary .
Home .
Investing .
Kudos .
Links .
Link to Us .
NAIS .
Peak Oil .
Prayer .
Profiles .
Provisos .
Retreat Areas .
RSS Feed .
Survival Guns .
SurvivalRealty.com .
Support .
Targets / Logs .
Ten Cent Challenge .
TMM Forum .
Writings .
|
|
|
«-- Odds 'n Sods: | Main | Lessons From Fiction--A Critique of "I Am Legend", by Michael Z. Williamson --» Letter Re: Advice on Long Term Ammunition Storage Techniques
Mr. Rawles: You recently wrote: "Oxygen absorbing packets would have no efficacy for ammunition storage. (These are designed just for killing insect larvae in storage foods)." Sorry, Jim, but that's not quite correct. Oxygen absorbing packets come in a variety of sizes and do their job very well. Their job? Absorbing oxygen. They are placed in packets of food such as jerky to reduce amount of oxygen which degrades the flavor of the food. That they also make life more difficult for bugs is a side-effect. The ability to absorb nearly all the free oxygen in an enclosed space makes
them uniquely qualified for preservation of a variety of things - including
guns and ammo. Back when Y2K was the big issue, I enclosed an SKS [carbine],
a hundred rounds
of ammo and several oxygen absorbing packets in a plastic tube with and glued-on
caps. I stored it outside for a year before I opened it up to check it out.
When I made my initial cut into the pipe I was rewarded with a "hiss" as
air entered the pipe. Since oxygen comprises about 16% of our sea-level atmosphere
and since it was now tied up in the packets I was left with a partial vacuum
inside the pipe. Upon reassembling the rifle, I loaded it with the ammo it
had been stored with and fired it. JWR Replies: I should have been more thorough in my reply to that letter, when I mentioned Oxygen (O2) absorbing packets. Instead of dismissively writing "...have no efficacy for ammunition storage" I should have written "...are not the best choice for ammunition storage". (I will update that post.) I will elaborate: If you are the "belt and suspenders" type, then by all means use both desiccant packets (such as silica gel) and O2 absorbing packets. But of the two, desiccants are much more reliable. The formation of rust takes two ingredients interacting with ferrous metals: moisture and oxygen. Ditto for oxidation of copper and brass. Without moisture present, corrosion will not occur with typical atmospheric oxygen levels. Hence, O2 absorbers are not "uniquely qualified", as you asserted. Both types of packets will work in protecting guns or ammunition is sealed
containers, but desiccants have far more reliable efficacy. The biggest
problem with typical
food grade
O2
absorbing
packets
is that there
is no easy way of insuring
that they
were
handled
properly
before
they
came to you.
The O2 absorbing packets that I have seen all have gas-permeable coverings.
If the seal on the outer package that the packets
were shipped in was compromised, or if they were removed from their original
packaging and later
re-packaged, then they will have virtually no usefulness. They are effectively
"used
up"
when they come in contact with
a large volume of air for more than a few hours. And once used, these packets
cannot be reactivated at home. You have to buy new ones. |
Visits Since 8/2005: Categories
Archives
Recent Posts
Built with Movable Type
|