Note from JWR: Today, I'm posting two more entries for the first round of the SurvivalBlog non-fiction writing contest. The winner will be announced tomorrow. (December 1st.) The writer of the best article will win a four day course certificate at Front Sight. (An up to $2,000 value!) Because of the success of the contest, we have decided to repeat this contest. "Round 2" of the contest begins December 1st will end on the last day of January.
When contemplating the self-sufficient/survivalist lifestyle, the most
common concerns are weapons, power generation, and food. One
area that is frequently overlooked is that of physical fitness. All
the non-hybrid
seed in
the world won't do you any good if you have a heart attack while trying
to plant it. All the guns in the world won't do you any good if you
can't
run to a defensive position without wheezing like an asthmatic in a
field of ragweed.
Getting in shape often seems like an impossible task. Although you may never
be able to be a body double for Brad Pitt or Kate Hudson, being healthy is a
very achievable goal for anyone. All it takes is a little knowledge, some common
sense, and dedication. The purpose of this article is to give you the basic knowledge
you'll need to achieve your fitness goals.
There are many factors that influence physical conditioning. Some are outside
the scope of this article (like stress) and some are so complicated that going
into depth about them would require a book (like nutrition). I'll be covering
some of the basics, but you may wish to do further research as your time and
inclination allow.
First up is a series of negative factors that impede the march to fitness. At
the top of the list is stress. It wears down your body, robbing you of the will
to workout. Although it's not always possible to completely eliminate stress,
reducing it should be a goal of first importance. Closely allied with stress
is lack of sleep. Too often our culture devalues sleep as a luxury, sacrificing
precious rest time for unimportant pursuits. Without proper rest your body can
neither recover from exercise, nor rebuild for further efforts. Relax, get enough
sleep and you'll be amazed how easy achieving your goals can be.
Now, let's take a look at some things you can do to enhance the effectiveness
of working out. At the front of the line is proper nutrition. I won't get into
specific diets or schools of nutritional thought, but there are a few general
rules anyone can follow. Cutting down on junk food (candy, soda, potato chips
etc), eating more fresh fruits and vegetables, eating breakfast first thing in
the
morning to get the metabolism working, and not eating for a few hours before
going to
sleep are all fairly easy to accomplish without drastic lifestyle changes.
Another
vital aspect of an effective fitness plan is pre-workout stretching. Often overlooked,
stretching properly reduces injuries, enhances the efficacy of a workout, and
builds flexibility.
Develop a routine that works for you, and do it religiously even on
days
you don't work out.
Okay, you've gotten a good night's sleep, had a thorough stretching session,
and you're ready to exercise! Next we're going to discuss some different types
of
exercises, their relative advantages and disadvantages, and how to get the most
out of them. For the purposes of this article we'll divide the various exercises
into two categories: aerobic and strength. Although there is often significant
overlap, this division helps to formulate a plan.
The aerobic (or cardiovascular) field of exercises function mainly to tone muscles,
build endurance, and build up the circulatory and respiratory systems. This field
should form the base of any exercise regime. Without proper circulation of well
aerated blood, one cannot hope to make any significant fitness gains. I t is
also the most important in terms of overall health.
The field of strength training is somewhat more limited, both in types of exercises
and in potential gains. To derive the full benefits of this field, one should
have a solid base of cardiovascular fitness. All this is not to demean strength
training; it is merely an attempt to put it into perspective. There are many
benefits to a proper strength training program, and it is definitely not a field
to be ignored.
There are as many ways of getting fit as there are unfit people. The key to it
all is persistence. Whether you choose an all out assault on fat that drastically
changes your entire lifestyle, or merely start walking the dog and skipping that
side of fries it's all for nothing if you don't keep at it. Find activities you
enjoy and make them a part of your routine. Find other like-minded individuals
and band together to support and encourage each other. Stay positive, stay motivated,
and soon you'll see results you thought impossible!
- "Bings"
What exactly do you stake your life on? Better stated, what is it
that you are willing to gamble your future on? A few dollars spent
on a fast-food meal that might have purchased a flat of beans or
some medical supplies? Perhaps it is a scoffed-at and discarded notion
that our society might indeed be fragile and easily disrupted? Maybe
it’s the insecurity that your friends and family will think
you are a some sort of a nut?
Are you secure in your lifestyle and beliefs because you still get
your paycheck at the end of the week and you have a weekend of grilling
and TV to look forward to?
Life is good.
But what if the unthinkable happens…
There are a thousand and one doomsday scenarios floating around.
Some are plausible, some are fantastic. But they all share the same
underlying theme: Be prepared.
Just stop and think about this with an open mind for just a few moments. I’m
not asking you to change your entire life philosophy or scare you into hiding.
Just stop your hectic life for ten minutes and give serious, honest thought to
one question: What if?
Let’s not talk about full preparedness for the end of the world. Let’s
talk about a few simple steps that could greatly increase your quality of life
on a short-term basis.
What if a simple, yet very possible scenario plays out?
A storm descends on your area and you and your family are suddenly without electrical
power for three days. Are you ready? Three days does not seem like a particularly
long time, yet you have no light, no water, no way to cook or heat food, and
in some cases, no heat or air conditioning. Three days have suddenly become a
very stressful and frightening time.
It’s true that most people could survive a three day period without changing
their current lifestyle. Cold food, minimal light, minimal water, and no heat.
You eat canned soup straight from the can. All four of your candles are lit,
but do not provide enough light or heat to be appreciated. You are reduced to
drinking the water from your toilet’s flush tank (not the bowl!),
and you
only have one extra blanket in the whole house. It would be very uncomfortable,
but survivable.
But perhaps you were brave and didn’t care what your friends have been
thinking about you for the past year. You were living on the edge and decided
to make simple preparations so that you and your family could not only survive
such small incidents, you would comfortably thrive.
Deciding to pick up a few extra cans of food when they are on sale, or better
yet, buying in bulk, has provided you with not only a meal, but a variety of
choices. Passing up on buying a few DVDs to purchase a camp stove now seems remarkably
prudent. You have a small source of heat, as well as a warm meal. (Even simple
things such as a warm meal can be a great morale booster in times of stress).
That small kerosene lantern you bought that has been collecting dust in the
back of your closet is now a cheerful provider of light. You had the forethought
to
store
a few gallons of drinking water, and those extra wool blankets that have been
crowding your linen closet are now a welcome relief.
The point is this: simple, inexpensive preparations will not appreciably cramp
your lifestyle, yet when needed, they reward you far more than the small sacrifices
it might have taken to acquire them.
Start thinking in terms of the basic needs for survival. Water, food, heat, light.
From there, you can expand from the basics to help yourself be ready for nearly
any situation. First aid/medical, self-protection, barter, etc. Be honest with
yourself. Is there a logical reason not to prepare?
Knowledge is power, and in today’s world of technology, knowledge is easily
found. Do some research, either at your local library, or on the Internet. Discover
what your options are before you categorically discard them as folly. Don’t
let fear, apathy, or arrogance paralyze you into non-action.
Self-sufficiency provides a marvelous boost of confidence. There is great peace
of mind that comes with the knowledge that you are ready to face adverse conditions,
that you have taken steps to provide a secure environment for yourself and your
family. At the end of the day, isn’t it far better to have it and not need
it, than to need it and not have it? - "Clannad"
To reply to the reader about the [Springfield Armory] M1A SOCOM [variant]. First, I have had and do have several M1A-A1 Scout rifles. I would not trade any of them for any other main battle rifle. Second, I personally know several [former] SEAL Team 2 members and other men who have worked with BlackWater in Iraq. The SOCOM is there preferred weapon, other than what would be Class 3 weapons for us [civilians]. - "Woo"
Sir:
While I cannot speak to the SOCOM, I am the proud owner of an M1A Scout
(my understanding that the primary difference in the two models is
the muzzle brake/compensator, and the SOCOM is a slightly shorter
barrel, perhaps due to the different muzzle brake). I give this rifle
a heart-felt thumbs-up. It shoots better than I do, swallows anything
I feed it (accuracy wise, it doesn't like the Indian stuff, I get
horrible groups with it; South African surplus averages about 3 MOA,
but premium Federal is sub-MOA), and Springfield has bent over backwards
with regards to customer service (when I ordered a 5-round magazine).
Complaints: It is heavy for a shorter rifle, especially with the
Springfield
7.62 scope and mount that I have on it. It was a real wrestling match
to field strip it the first few times, until it was broken in. Oh yes,
the fact
that it costs [like] a small mortgage to purchase. (Springfield is
back-ordered, so if you can find one under $1,400, then grab it) Other
than that,
it's my primary weapon, and I'm using it this season on New York bear
and deer
(with
the legal 5-round sporting magazine). Best Regards, - Mike
Mr. Rawles:
Here is a link to the jaw-droppingly absurd, but true. CNN ran a story
about Michael Brown getting fired from FEMA only
to go into the Emergency Planning "consulting" business.
See: http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/11/24/brown.consultant.ap/index.html We
can all sleep better now knowing that America is once again safe. Regards,
-B. Adams
"When you get into a tight place and everything goes against
you, till it seems as though you could not hold on a minute longer,
never give up then, for that is just the place and time that the tide
will turn."
- Harriet Beecher Stowe
It really doesn't matter if we are thinking slow slide, nuke exchange,
or just losing your job: The full or partial switch to a
bicycle can be one of the best changes a person can make. DO
NOT jump into a decision about buying a bike. It is one of the most
personal things you will ever own, if you don't buy the right bike
for you it will just end up rusting in the barn.
As I like to beat into you:
#1 It must be easy to use or you won't when you are worn out tired
#2 Try not to attract unwanted attention, make it look cheap/old
A bicycle is a balance of simplicity versus features.On one side is
a single speed coaster bicycle with closed cell foam inner(not)tubes.
Moving parts: Wheel bearings, chain, crank bearing, coaster hub brake,
headset (handlebar bushing), and pedal. Using only 7 moving parts and
no pneumatic tires
this bike may need repacked bearings and a new chain every few years
(barring rust-away) there not much to go wrong. On a simple bicycle
like this I suggest a steel frame from a quality brand. Get quality
coaster hubs from brands like SRAM and Sturmer-Archer. Chrome or stainless
steel chains will resist rust. (Rust robs more performance than almost
any other cause.) Durable tires with a center strip will greatly reduce
the effort required to travel on road. To get more complicated you
could go to something with more moving parts like a mountain, road,
or touring bike which make the ride easier by allowing you to move
faster or climb hills easier by giving you a wide range of gears. Some
features to investigate are disk or rim brakes(hydraulic or cable),
heavy duty shocks on the front, seat post or rear suspension, derailler
gear shifting (a massive failure point, so only buy the most durable
or have spares) or internal hub gearing, toe clip or clipless foot
attachment, the list could go on.
Another direction is to choose a folding bike. A folder can also be
durable but can pack into a large suitcase size allowing you to catch
a ride when available, the trade-offs may be durability or riding comfort
and accessory options, I suggest trying out several brands before dismissing
this group.
Visit several bicycle shops and find a personal mechanic to help you
build your bike. A decent mechanic makes his work a passion and will
be able to point out the best solution for your application.
Unless you have money only for food and shelter and nothing else don't
waste money on an Asian sub $40-to-$100 15 speed, they are of such
poor quality it will forever remain in reserve at the back of your
garage after its first ride (just try to keep it in one gear).
Rather than telling you what to think, spend a while researching
this topic for yourself on the web and in bike shops. You may also
consider buying a mid-level bike and getting to be a regular rider
so you can deciding what needs to be improved before making a big purchase.
Some Points To Ponder:
Where will you be riding (terrain, topology, road type)?
What will you be carrying?
What weather will you ride in?
Ability to upgrade?
Durability of components?
Ease of repair in field?
Comfort on long rides?
Long term resistance to environment (rust,sun,etc)?
Trailer or baggage options?
Lighting and generator options?
Electrical or gas auxiliary drive systems?
Ease of vehicular transport (auto,air,train,bus,boat)?
Storage?
Anti-theft options?
Tools, availability/stockpile spares, field tools?
JWR Adds: Some flat black and flat rust-brown spray paint, applied judiciously, will make a brand new $400 bike look like an ancient $40 bike in just a few minutes. (It will also cut down on reflective surfaces to make it "tactical.") However, keep in mind that this will not do good things for your bike's resale value, in the event that you ever have a reason to "trade up." So unless you live in what is currently an area with a high rate of bicycle theft, it is probably best to keep your supply of subduing paint in storage and to apply it only after The Schumer Hits The Fan.
First, this is not an endorsement of any kind. I really want that to
be clear to the readers of SurvivalBlog.
I've been wearing glasses for the better part of 35 years. I had myopia
and astigmatism. I was wearing bifocals. For many reasons wearing glasses
can be a big pain in the "six". I had been considering Lasik
surgery for several years and just didn't have the money, justification
and/or the courage to get the procedure done.
To me the decision was made several weeks ago when I heard a noise
in the house and I went to investigate. There was nothing there. Just
the dishwasher changing gears. Anyway, I realized that I did have a
problem. It was my vision. I can't just wake up and see things. I have
to first find my glasses to see.
Usually, when waking up suddenly one is a little disorganized. However,
trying to find your glasses makes it worse. The thought came to me
that if I accidentally knocked them on the floor during the night (which
has happened) I would be in a real pickle if it was a real two legged
bump in the night.
The other thought was that if it was a SHTF or TEOTWAWKI
I didn't want
to be a slave to my glasses for visual aid. If I lost them or they
broke them or whatever, I might not be able to get a replacement pair.
On that subject I don't know a lot of folks that have extra pairs of
glasses
for replacement. Older pairs of glasses are old for a reason. If I
couldn't see than my effective range would be about three feet. Personally
I couldn't do that to my family.
So, I built up my courage and with my end of the year bonus I went
and had Lasik surgery done. The actual surgery was approximately 6
or so minutes. I wont go into all the details of that, however, less
than 24 hours after the procedure I had 20/20 vision and it should
improve from that. The most important thing to me is that I'm no longer
a slave to glasses. I can see across the room and across the street.
I can read road signs that would have been a blur just a few days ago
without my glasses. My eyes wont fog up from temperature changes and
get fingerprints on them, et cetera. My effective range is over 300
yards without glasses.
The money I spent on this could have bought a lot of beans, bullets
and band-aids. I consider this a personal investment in my family's
future and survival insurance. ("Better to have and not need than to
need and not have.")
This isn't for everyone, so check with your doctor. If anyone else
has had this done maybe they would like to share their experiences.
All for now, - Larry from Kansas
P.S.: Always wear eye protection when shooting. Your sight is very
valuable!
Dancing at Armageddon, Survivalism and Chaos in Modern Times, by Richard
G. Mitchell, Jr., 2002, University of Chicago Press.
Unlike some of you “lifers”, I’m new to preparedness.
So I’m always looking for good books to read to learn more about
preparedness, like Patriots. But there is one topic I
don’t find written about very much: what is a survivalist, where
do they live, and how do you meet one? So when I stumbled across this
book on the internet, I was very curious to read the synopsis. It turns
out the author spent 12 years interviewing and living with survivalists.
This was the mother lode! Here is what appears to be the defining work
of who and what survivalists are.
I eagerly ordered my copy and impatiently awaited for its arrival.
Once it was delivered, I immediately opened it and started reading.
But I’m sorry to say, my excitement quickly drifted to boredom,
then confusion, and finally frustration. While this book does have
snippets of interesting interviews, overall it is a misguided, pompous,
insult to survivalism and preparedness.
I call this book misguided, because the author focused on four main
groups, and three of these groups have nothing to do with survivalism.
The author spent years infiltrating the Aryan Nation to become an insider.
And what did he find? They are mean and hateful people. No big surprise
here, but nothing about survivalism or preparedness. The author also
spent time with a whacko militia in the northwest. This group never
discussed food, water, or shelter. All they did was run around in the
woods playing cops and robbers with shotgun blanks. But this does lead
to one of the best scenes in the book, where the author ambushes one
of the numskulls at close range out of his own frustration. A blank
at close range can be quite painful. Another group was an ultra-conservative
religious fringe group. Not much to learn here either.
The last group was what I would call true survivalists, working together
to gather essentials so their families would be prepared for any major
disaster. They were led by “Hank” of the Mount Rainier
Rangers. Now here was a group I could identify with and hope to learn
from. But the author paints this group as ineffective and meaningless.
By the end of the book, “Hank” has lost his job, his house,
and all his supplies. The message from the author is subdued, but clear:
Survivalists are weak-minded and inconsequential individuals that can’t
even survive in the current economy, much less a troubled one.
I call this book pompous, because at many points it is impossible to
understand what he is saying. The author is definitely a college professor,
because he writes like one. And probably only another college professor
would understand what he is writing about in his many sections. Here’s
an example from page 146: “Grounded social science seeks utility
beyond mere situation-specific description.” What the heck does
this mean? The book is full of phrases like this.
The final insult can be found in the appendix of the book. The author
interviewed over 200 individuals who openly stood up as survivalist.
This is a huge number. Yet he chose to profile the groups above. Obviously
he must have interviewed many serious, responsible individuals. But
this is not reflected in the text. It seems like the real survivalists
were intentionally left out.
Okay, I much as I dislike this book, I will admit there are nuggets
of gold sprinkled through-out the book. Near the end of the book, the
author quotes one individual as follows: “A survivalist is basically
an independent person who cannot in his mind see the status quo remaining.
He does not have faith that the powers-that-be will take care of him
in all situations. That’s all. It’s like being your own
insurance. If there is a windstorm and your house gets damaged, you
don’t wait for the government to come and help. You start to
rebuild right away with what you have and do the best you can.” I
like that phrase, “being your own insurance”.
The statistics in the appendix are also somewhat interesting. Nearly
80% of survivalist are married, they are not single hermits living
in a shack like the Unabomber. A full 50% worry about nuclear war,
but only 7% have fallout shelters. Only 37% worry about economic collapse.
And over 50% have some type of college degree. The most common preparation?
63% have already acquired firearms. I think there is more info in the
appendix than the rest of the book.
One final observation. When I bought this book, I did not understand
why the author titled it “Dancing at Armageddon”. I don’t
plan to do any dancing when the “Schumer hits the fan.”
I plan to do what any rational person will do, use my knowledge and
materials to help my family, neighbors, and community pull together
to survive through any catastrophe. If I get excited when discussing
my preparations, it is NOT because I want trouble to come. I get excited
because I am learning there are common sense actions I can take today
to survive tomorrow. So in essence, the title is one more insult to
survivalists, implying we want trouble to come, and will celebrate
with dancing when it arrives. I know I will not be dancing, but I probably
will be using this book for kindling. Always learning something new,
- The Rookie
JWR's Comment: Just leave it to a liberal journalist
to focus on the tiny lunatic racist fringe rather than on the mainstream
of responsible,
rational, open-minded survivalists.
Jim:
Why is it, Jim, that when I ask a coin shop about "junk silver" or
pre-1965 [$1,000 face value] bags of silver they look at me as if I'm
nuts? Am I going to the wrong place? - Gerry
JWR Replies: It sounds like you visited a "numismatics only" shop. Some shops don't bother selling bullion because the markup is so much less than rare coins. Just call around to several other dealers in your region. Odds are that most of them will sell pre-'65 by the bag or half-bag--or can at least they can order it for you.
"Commander Harken: For some the war'll never be over. I notice
your ship's called Serenity. You were stationed on Hera at the end
of the war. Battle of Serenity Valley took place there, if I recall.
Captain Reynolds: You know, I believe you might be right.
Commander Harken: Independents suffered a pretty crushing defeat there.
Some say after Serenity, the Browncoats were through. That the war
really ended in that valley.
Captain Reynolds: Hmmm.
Commander Harken: Seems odd you'd name your ship after a battle you
were on the wrong side of.
Captain Reynolds: May have been the losing side. Still not convinced
it was the wrong one."
- From the cancelled science fiction television series "Firefly"
Note from JWR: It is gratifying to see that the SurvivalBlog readership is still growing steadily. Please continue to to tell your family, friends, and co-workers about this blog. God willing, reading SurvivalBlog will motivate them to get "squared away" logistically. Their increased preparedness could help save many lives: their own, yours, your friends, your neighbors, and your loved ones. So it is in your own best interest to spread the word!
We will be announcing the winner of the first SurvivalBlog
non-fiction writing contest on December 1st. The
writer of
the best
article
will
win a four day course certificate at Front
Sight! (An up to $2,000 value.) Because of the success of the
contest, we
have decided to repeat this contest. "Round
2" of the contest begins December 1st will
end on the last day of January.
In person at guns shows and at public speaking engagements, as well as in e-mail, I often have folks mention some of the odd, if not bizarre things that they have purchased for their survival preparations. They run the gamut:
Ostentatious: The reader that blew virtually his entire preparation budget on a brand new BMW 4x4 SUV
Impractical: The gent who said that he owns just one firearm: An AR-15 with five 100-round Beta C-MAGs, a rail-mounted white flashlight, a rail-mounted IR flashlight, PAQ-4 laser target designator, a Gen 3 PVS-4 starlight scope, bipod, and a pseudo-M203 (37mm) flare launcher.
Underachieving: The man who had a whopping two cases of MREs (24 meals) en toto as his family's food storage supply. Not to worry. He said that he was "planning to get at least one more case."
Hypochondriacal: The lady that purchased more than $3,000 worth of vitamins and medications for herself and her husband --far more than can be used before the end of the useful shelf life of the meds. Her stockpile includes "heart medicine, in case either of us ever develop a heart condition."
Absurd: The reader that had accumulated hundreds of rolls of toilet paper but who complained: "I lack room in my garage and my storage space for much storage food."
Clueless: The man with more than 2,000 pounds of hard red winter wheat, but that didn't own a wheat grinder.
I suggest a practical, well-balanced approach to preparedness. Here
is my preparedness philosophy in a nutshell: You want to buy quality.
You
want things
that will last.
But why pay
$5,000
for
a Rolex
Submariner watch, when an O&W Swiss watch that is built just as
well will do the same thing, for far less than half as much money? The
inverse corollary is just as important: Why buy a cheap set of low
grade "Made in China" tools that will break the first time
that they are used instead of buying a set of Craftsman or Snap-On
tools which will last a lifetime? You need to be realistic and
strike a commonsense middle ground. Being a truly prepared individual
takes wisdom, discernment, and dedication. Learn to objectively judge
both the things that you buy and the people that you associate with. You
will have to depend on both your logistics and your survival
team When the Schumer Hits The Fan (WTSHTF). Make plans and stick to
them. Don't develop a plan that is so grand that you never get started.
Start small and build on that success. Prioritize your purchases. Don't
go overboard in one area (such as firearms/accessories or commo gear)
to the detriment of other important preparations. Rid yourself of non-essentials
(like your Jet-Skis and your big screen plasma television.) Concentrate
on things that work. Concentrate on friends that work--not
those who just talk. Buy in bulk. Buy without a paper trail.
Don't put all of your eggs in one basket. Pre-position key logistics
at your
retreat. Don't scrimp on protecting what you've bought from
rust, rot, moths, and critters. (This means getting proper airtight
storage containers, a locking CONEX,
a gun vault, Golden Rod Dehumidifiers, 02 absorbing
packets, diatomaceous earth, et cetera.) Buy extra for barter
and more importantly for charity.
Be circumspect about your preparations. (The whole town doesn't need
to know that you have a three year food
supply and 100K rounds of ammo.) Recognize potential threats but don't
panic. Instead, plan methodically. Most importantly: pray first, then
prepare, and always live by The Golden Rule.
Don't miss the article titled The Great Debate by Puru Saxena which recently ran in The Daily Reckoning. In it, Saxena refutes the widespread belief is that the Federal Reserve is currently increasing interest-rates to "control" inflation. Here is an excerpt from his excellent article:
"The grim reality is that the modern day central banking IS inflation...and the quicker we get used to this idea, the better. The deflation scare is nothing more than a decoy, which the central banks use in order to continue with their money-printing (inflationary) program.
Still not convinced? Then, consider the greatest fabrication, the Japanese "deflation" scare. For years now, we have been told repeatedly that the root cause of Japan's economic problems is deflation. We have been forced into thinking that deflation is the culprit. Allow me to share a secret - the central banks want you to believe that deflation is a total disaster so that they can freely print more money, thereby creating inflation. After all, who benefits from the monetization of the economy?
Despite all the brainwashing, close inspection reveals that Japan never really had any deflation! The truth is that throughout the past 15 years, Japan's money supply has continued to grow (inflation). Japan has witnessed inflation, and not deflation, since 1980. Sure, Japanese asset prices have fallen since 1990, but the cause is not deflation, as advertised by the establishment. In fact, a sharp rise in interest-rates was the trigger, which caused the Japanese stock and property bubbles to burst.
These days, we are being told that the Federal Reserve is raising interest-rates to "control" inflation. If the Federal Reserve were really curbing inflation, why would the American money supply continue to surge despite recent interest-rate hikes? Despite all the noise about inflation, the Federal Reserve has added roughly $1 trillion to the system over the last year. So, on one hand, the Federal Reserve continues to inflate, and on the other hand, it is raising rates. "But why would they do that?" you may ask. You see, the U.S. economy is in a mess, and a true contraction in the money supply (deflation) would send the whole world into a severe recession. Under this scenario, millions of companies and individuals would go bust and the entire financial system may collapse. Therefore, you can rest assured that the Federal Reserve will continue to inflate for as long as possible. It is shocking to note that the broad-based money supply (M3) has increased from $ 6.5 trillion to $10 trillion in five years - representing a 54% increase! Yeah, Greenspan did a fine job "managing" inflation!
As far as the current situation is concerned, I believe the Federal Reserve is raising interest-rates to prevent an outright collapse of the U.S. dollar..."
Visit The Daily Reckoning web site to read the rest of Mr. Saxena's article. If you do not yet already subscribe to The Daily Reckoning (a free e-mail subscription), then I highly recommend it.
By popular demand, The Pre-1899 Specialist has removed the password restriction on his web site. For those of you that have experienced trouble logging in, try it again now! See: http://www.antiquefirearms.org/blog.html
************
Reader "C.G." recommends a battery-powered zip stove for camping and short term outdoor survival . See: http://www.zzstove.com/index.html
************
The Chinese city of Harbin (with 3.8 million residents) closed schools and was trucking in drinking water last week after shutting down its water system following a chemical plant explosion. The chemical contamination is working its way down the Songhua River, into Siberia. See: http://g.msn.com/0MN2ET7/2?http://msnbc.msn.com/id/10170448/from/ET/
"Use it up, wear it out, make do, or do without." - Traditional American Folk Saying on Thrifty Living
Note from JWR: I have again expanded the SurvivalBlog Glossary. It is now much more comprehensive--with many more technical entries. And for the benefit of our overseas readers, I have added a lot of acronyms that are already familiar to most Americans.
Mr. Rawles:
The following response is not intended to be insulting, but I fear it must
inevitably come across as such. L.C.’s ignorance is so astonishing
in its breadth and depth that I do not know how else to address it. I therefore
apologize from the outset for what follows, but understand that this is all
intended in the sincere hope of increasing understanding and not some sort
of “I know more than you do” contest.
L.C. wrote: “I was moderately concerned for the first time reading
your blog this past week in regards to the post on Gold and Silver Barter.
[On October 27th--see the SurvivalBlog
archives] In there you referred to the American public as having ‘been
robbed’ [by inflation and debasement of our currency.]”
Mr.
Rawles made a precisely correct observation. For example, if you have money
in savings earning 1.5% interest [per year], but a deliberate policy of monetary
inflation is eroding the buying power of your money at, say, 2.5% [per
year], then, yes,
it would be safe to conclude that you are being robbed (and note that
I have not even
considered taxes in this equation). Bear in mind that inflation, by definition,
is almost universally a central bank creation that can usually only exist with
a fiat currency. (Yes, there are exceptions to this rule, but they are fantastically
rare).
L.C. wrote: “My concern is that this is one of the few places
where survivalists get the bad rap of being crazy.”
Those who truly understand what is going on in the world often are accused
of being crazy by the less well informed - this is a common thread throughout
recorded history. And sometimes the so accused ARE in fact crazy! But in many
cases one finds that such people are not crazy, but merely far more perceptive
than is the norm. There were those who foresaw where Hitler and his Thousand
Year Reich were going long before Kristallnacht, and fled. They lived.
Those who didn’t for the most part ended their lives in unspeakable,
hellish agony in places like Auschwitz and Dachau. And yet, the folks who fled
were no doubt regarded as “crazy” at the time. Tell me, which group
would YOU rather have been in?
Much of what most survivalists believe is regarded as crazy by the mainstream.
I would submit, however, that it is the mainstream that has it wrong, not the
survivalists.
L.C. wrote: “I want to point out something: whether it's gold,
a paper dollar, or a rock, the value of whatever item is determined by faith,
not intrinsic value. Gold is only valuable to us because we decided that shiny
stuff was so important that we were willing to trade long, hard days of work
for a little bit of it.”
This is partially correct; just correct enough to cause folks like L.C. to
come to the precisely wrong conclusion! It would take perhaps several books
to cure this profound misunderstanding; let me just state that gold was (and
is, amongst more enlightened individuals) considered valuable for reasons far
beyond mere faith. It was chosen as money in what can only be described as
a harshly Darwinian process of “natural selection” that weeded
out all other contenders (save silver, and perhaps copper or copper alloy for
small denominations). Space does not permit me to delve into detail; I leave
that as an exercise for the class to look up on their own time.
L.C. wrote:“At one point in our nation's past we limited the
currency in the market to be equal to the value of the gold the US Treasury
has on hand - but there was a problem. By the 1950s, during our rebuilding
of the country post-WWII, there was so much growth going on that we actually
were outpacing the availability of gold in the market. We were slowly stifling
our own economy because we could not produce more goods and services that there
was physical gold in the market.”
Mr. Rawles addressed this pretty well, but I would like to add something here.
Not all economic “growth” is beneficial in the long run. One can
have healthy growth, and one can have growth that is more akin to a cancerous
tumor. America’s “growth”, particularly over the last 40
years, is well and truly a cancer, which is in the end going to kill this once
great nation.
And, no, we were not “stifling” our economy - that oft repeated
myth has zero basis in fact or reality, and betrays a deep and profound ignorance
of how money actually works.
L.C. wrote: “Finally, common sense prevailed when we realized
something: The American public did not need gold, they needed dollars. They
can not use gold in the grocery, the feed store, or the mall. Dollars they
can use.”
Nonsense! What the American public actually needs is a stable currency
- which is precisely what gold is! Unless you happen to think that paying $1
million
for a 1st Class postage stamp is a great idea. I suggest you spend some time
educating yourself on the concept of hyperinflation. Weimar Republic Germany
in the 1920s is a good place to start, and provides an excellent case in point
as to why sane people with IQs higher than room temperature do not advocate
a fiat currency.
As an aside, why could not one use gold in a grocery store? Prior to 1933,
folks would do just that! There were $1, $2.50, $3, $5, $10, and $20 gold coin
denominations that were all legal tender. The statements quoted from L.C.'s
e-mail are not merely ignorant, but irrational. I am sorry for what I am about
to say, L.C., but in all honesty if you had asserted something this idiotic
within arms reach I’d have slapped you into next week, just on general
principle.
L.C. wrote: “People have more faith in the dollar than they
do in the ounce of gold.” This may be true (to a point), but not in a
good way. It basically means that people have more faith in a corrupt and evil
politician’s empty promise, then the millennia proven security of gold.
Hardly an example of sound reasoning! But then, the Sheeple believe many irrational
and stupid things.
L.C. wrote: “Let the economy grow!” Just like that, eh?
Instant economy, just add water and dollars and watch it grow? Sorry, I couldn’t
resist. Actually, that has just enough truth to be superficially correct!
But, as I pointed out earlier, it is not a healthy growth. It is a cancer,
and it will in no uncertain terms destroy us.
L.C. wrote:“To imply that we have been fooled
is to imply conspiracy and breeds distrust.” Well, yes, your
point, please? The irrefutable facts are that we have been fooled,
there is ample evidence to suggest at least an indirect conspiracy
of philosophy (if not out and out corruption), and overwhelming proof
that smart, sane folks should be distrustful, just as Germans should have
been distrustful in the 1930s, and Russians from 1919 onwards. Folks
in this day and age that are distrustful act so based on solid historical
and economic facts. Those who choose to ignore history and basic reality
will suffer accordingly - unfortunately, so will the rest of us. Truth
is truth and reality is reality. We are being cheated in no uncertain
terms. Calling attention to this fact does not itself breed distrust
- it is the committing of this massive fraud in the first place that
is responsible for that. Sticking your head in the sand does not resolve
the fundamental problem, or make it go away. I should not have to explain
this to an adult, but obviously...
Based on these statements, L.C., I would surmise that, had you lived in Germany
in 1933, you would have swallowed Hitler’s National Socialist party line
hook, line, and sinker. After all, you wouldn’t have wanted to “imply
conspiracy” or “breed distrust” (though, admittedly, that
might have been a good move, sparing you a trip to Auschwitz. On the other
paw, you might have lived just long enough to get carpet bombed by B-17s...)
L.C. wrote: “We may differ here, but I believe that is completely
possible to work within the system until there is no system. When there is
no system, I will be beside the other readers here making the best of the barter
system.”
“May differ” is a grand understatement of the highest order. Further,
one may possess all sorts of beliefs, none of which having any factual or rational
basis. And the barter system is fantastically inefficient; indeed, the term “barter
economy” is truly an oxymoron.
L.C. wrote: “...Until then, I will happily use my U.S. Dollars
to purchase those items, never once believing I have been duped.”
Ignorance is well and truly Bliss! It is not so much a question of not believing
you have been duped, but rather whether or not you are capable of comprehending
the fact of having been duped. Do not feel bad that you cannot at this point
understand, for this colossal scam is subtle indeed - probably less than 1
in 10,000 can properly diagnose the problem. A hint: the dollars you used to
purchase items today do not go as far as the dollars you used 5 years ago (or
25 years ago, for that matter). And don’t get me started on the pure
fraud that is the Consumer Price Index!
L.C. wrote: “To summarize, whether it is gold, paper
currency, diamond, or potato - the value of any item is what we're willing
to trade in labor or tangibles to obtain
it."
Absolutely true! But it is not the whole truth, by any stretch.
L.C. wrote: “The U.S. Dollar's value is not, and should not
be based on our perceived value of gold, since gold has no value of its own
other than what we assign it.”
Very, very, VERY wrong on all counts. Why this is so requires a book, not a
sound bite, to address. Again, a homework assignment for the class.
L.C. wrote:“Gather your junk silver and gold for WTSHTF, but
don't believe in it more than the dollar. Oh, and don't worry about the feds
coming to take away your gold - since we're not on the gold standard then they
don't need it.” Actually, the government will confiscate anything
they deem of value, whether it is gold, dollars, stocks/bonds, gasoline, food,
etc. The whole concept of government is founded solely upon the principle of
organized theft, and nothing else. There are no exceptions to this rule in
all of recorded human history.
********************************************************
The central problem here is that L.C. is so profoundly ignorant that he doesn’t
know enough to know any better - hence is utter “certainty” in
his pronouncements from on High - a certainty that can only exist in those
who know literally nothing about the subject being discussed (or, perhaps more
accurately, know just enough to be dangerous). Or, put another way, his statements
are a priceless example of the "Law of Logical Argument”, wherein “Anything
is possible if you don't know what you are talking about."
Reminds me of a woman who insisted (quite shrilly, I might add) that inflation
was, and I quote, “caused by the CPI” (
Consumer Price Index), which is exactly like saying that my speedometer “caused” my
car to drive at 65 miles per hour, and just as irretrievably stupid.
Fortunately, L.C. is, in my estimation, simply ignorant, not stupid. Very ignorant
and misled, perhaps, but at least it is a curable condition. But how to undo
a lifetime of Keynesian economics indoctrination! Where does one even begin?
Well, let us begin at the beginning. What, exactly, is “money,” anyway?
Now, if you look in a dictionary it will tend to describe it in terms of coins
or paper used as a medium of exchange, or as property, possessions or wealth.
The former is correct, though very incomplete; at least it touches on the concept
of a medium of exchange. The latter is actually wrong; money and wealth are
really not the same thing. Here is the most succinct and essential definition
you will ever find (or need): “Money is an information system we use
to deploy human effort” - Michael Linton, originator of the Local Employment
and Trading System. Kenneth Royce (a.k.a. “Boston T. Party”) expands
this definition to state “Money is an information system we use to spread
out human effort so as to form a wider front.”
A “wider front” against what? Against the formidable destructive
forces of Nature - Entropy, decay, etc. Forces that will destroy any civilization.
Look at it this way - one person working alone is not going to be able to achieve
much more than a precarious, hand to mouth existence, let alone build a civilization.
Only large groups of people working together can do that. And there are only
three ways to motivate people to work together: Love, Force, or Trade.
I very much doubt I will get folks to build me a home simply out of kindness
(and I am not destitute enough for Habitat for Humanity to come by...). I suppose
I could round up people at the muzzle end of my M1 Garand and “convince” them
to build my dream home, but I expect the authorities would frown upon this.
In any case, even if I were a Soviet Commissar with this sort of power, I doubt
I would get a very high quality home out of the bargain, and I would probably
need to watch my back.
In either case, Love and Force simply require too much up close and personal
attention to be practical - this is in part why the Soviet Union collapsed.
Only Trade can work to deploy human effort in any sort of meaningful manner.
And Trade requires a functioning, uncorrupted money system in order to work
properly.
If you can grasp and internalize the aforementioned definitions of money, you
will be able to understand in truth how economics really works. Those who cannot
(or will not) will never really understand, no matter how much they may delude
themselves to the contrary. Argue all you want, you will be no less wrong then
when you started.
Wealth, BTW, is perhaps best described as being the fruits of human labor,
whether it is in the form of material goods or information (note that raw materials
or land can also be considered wealth). Money, therefore, is used as a device
to communicate the relative values of different forms of wealth. This last
is my definition, based on my current understanding of economic matters, and
I welcome other inputs.
So why does gold make a good form of money? There are a number of reasons,
some of them hinted at by Mr. Rawles, but the most important is that it cannot
be arbitrarily created out of thin air (i.e. “fiat”). When you
have a fiat system, such as the modern “dollar”, you invariably
start to introduce distortions in pricing that create a compounding “snowball” effect
that will, eventually and inevitably, bring down the entire system.
Remember what I said earlier about money being a communications tool? Consider
this: an army in the field relies on communications. If said communications
are disrupted, then the lower echelons cannot report the tactical situation
up the chain to the generals, who in their turn cannot issue commands to deploy
their troops down to said troops. End result: the army is defeated.
Kenneth Royce put it best: “To destroy an army, destroy its communications.
To destroy a civilization, destroy its MONEY.”
*******************************
Contrary to L.C.’s insane assertion that people needed dollars and not
gold (betraying some of his obvious confusion about the concept of money),
the ability to grow a money supply is not a good thing, for in the long run
(and sometimes even in the short run) it will lead to economic ruin.
“But but but look at all the GROWTH!!!!” ...or so I envision L.C.
sputtering as he reads the above. And who can blame him? Have we not “grown” a
great deal? Are we not much more prosperous then we were, say, 100 years ago?
That depends. What L.C. certainly does not grasp, and perhaps most others here
do not realize either, is that a significant portion of this perceived prosperity
is created by *robbing the future* to pay for fun and games now. How this occurs
is artful, to say the least.
One method is simply to incur massive debts that your children and grandchildren
are expected to pay off. The U.S. Debt is somewhere in the multi-TRILLION dollar
range - which, logically, will mean our descendents shall become, for all intents
and purposes, slaves.
But the main method is simply through inflation. By arbitrarily printing more
money, or simply injecting credit into the system, you invariably lower the
value of dollars. Simple supply and demand folks! All else remaining equal,
when something becomes more available, its value dwindles. Did you know that
since 1913 (the year the Federal Reserve was formed) the dollar has literally
lost 95% (perhaps more, now) of its purchasing power? And that the bulk of
that loss started from about 1965-1975 (i.e. the years in which we eliminated
silver from our coinage and repudiated the gold standard) onwards? This is
NOT, in any way, shape, or form, a coincidence.
So what do you think happens to folks who try to save money? Well, if you get
1.5% interest on your savings, but inflation is 2.5% (or more; 6%-7% is a much
more plausible figure), then, yes, you end up stealing from them. This is because
the creators of this added “money” get to use it at its current “full” value
- but those further down the food chain lose buying power because the added
liquidity has caused prices of goods and services to rise (and savings just
wither away, period). Thus, if you are saving for retirement, you are screwed.
Inflation is, in effect, a stealth tax - and a fairly greedy one at that. But
it is the only way for government to grow itself. After all, the level of up
front taxation required to support a government as bloated and massive as ours
with an honest monetary system (i.e. gold based) would exceed 90% of an individual’s
income (not exaggerating here, by the way). Which would, quite naturally, result
in an open revolt of the “blood running in the sewers” variety
in VERY short order.
Which of course leads to one of the main problems with L.C.’s rose-tinted
lens view of the world, namely that much of the “growth” we have
witnessed has been in government. Many of the readers here detest government
intrusion into their lives, and yet have never once bothered to consider this
essential truth: such a level of intrusion would be largely or even wholly
IMPOSSIBLE without a fiat money system! Without the ability to inflate, all
taxes have to be more or less direct. And as noted earlier the level of taxation
in an honest system of money required to support such un-Constitutional abominations
such as the IRS, DEA, HUD, ATF, etc. would simply be unsustainable. Only by
creating a purely artificial “prosperity” through a policy of inflation
can one simultaneously keep such parasitical organizations (would you spend
money on ATF “services” if you had a choice in the matter...? Didn’t
think so) afloat whilst also keeping the masses content and relatively happy.
As an aside, it should be pointed out that even folks who favor some sort of
governmental control might balk at actually paying the costs of such. Continuing
with the ATF example, if the gun-grabbers truly had to deal with the direct
and indirect costs in an up front and direct manner, it is doubtful there would
be any real support for such controls or this agency. It is one thing when
the costs are completely hidden, but when, say, 25% of what you make goes to
law enforcement, you take a sudden and very deep rooted interest in precisely
HOW this money is being spent. Non-effective or even counter-productive use
of such money (such as ATF, DEA, etc.) will be immediately highlighted and
CUT, without further thought or discussion.
Only dishonest people (i.e. politicians, central bankers, socialists, etc.)
want dishonest money.
But there is a far more subtle and sinister side effect that few indeed realize:
the artificial prosperity I noted above also causes us to blaze through natural
resources at a MUCH higher rate then would ever be possible under an honest
monetary system. We are now starting to see resource depletion on a significant
scale, from diminishing oil supplies to over fished oceans. We are quite literally
stealing the future from our descendents.
What is the root of all evil? Not money, but rather the desire to get something
at someone else’s’ expense. In this respect, the so-called “Greatest” Generation
and their parents were probably the greediest, as they foisted all of this
expense upon us (in fairness, though, they were duped to a significant degree
- but they still should have KNOWN better. It is a universal moral law: you
can’t get something for nothing!).
Folks, these bills are going to come due at some point! Yeah, maybe YOU don’t
have to pay them, but I bet your children and grandchildren won’t adore
you. In any case, it is a moral abomination to force others to pay your expenses;
it is literally theft, albeit indirect. Perhaps you won’t face the music
down here on Earth, but do not think such an evil thing will go unpunished
forever. (There is a reason why the Bible considers usury to be wrong...)
There is only one way to, in truth, grow an economy: produce a larger surplus
of useful goods and services. There are no true shortcuts to this! Anyone who
says otherwise is trying to sell you something.
“Government” produces nothing (save mountains of paperwork, rampant
corruption, and injustice), and offers very little of value in terms of services.
Certainly the ATF, HUD, DEA et al could be swallowed up by a giant fissure in
the earth and the only result would be the betterment of all life on this planet
(if not, ultimately, the entire Universe). So what do we even want government
for, anyway? Good question... honestly not much.
In reality, virtually all government services (the useful ones, that is) could
just as easily be provided through other, more “libertarian” means.
But setting that aside what we really want out of government is order, specifically “useful”,
as opposed to surplus, order. In other words I want them to keep disaffected
malcontents from flying passenger airliners into buildings, keep out “immigrants” whose
goal is to subvert and take over our country, rather than become Americans,
and prevent fanatic Chinese commies from launching nukes at us. Providing coordination
and additional resources for local law enforcement to help track down serial
killers, rapists, and other thugs might be nice, too.
But the problem is, we get “surplus” order - DEA thugs busting
down some 70 year old grandmothers door at 4:00 AM because they were too stupid
to get the right address, ATF sturmtruppen burning a bunch of religious
dissidents alive in their church (or stomping on helpless kittens and roughing
up pregnant women), Education bureau-rats forcing kindergartners to learn about
gay lifestyles, EPA slime balls shutting down some small business over a paperwork
infraction, BLM agents becoming cattle rustlers, etc. etc., ad nauseam.
This is what L.C.’s blind faith in fiat dollars has really bought for
us: a bloated, incompetent, feral, and tyrannical, government. The sort of
government that is rapidly starting to make Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia
look like a Libertarian paradise by comparison (don’t believe me? Give
it a few years; you’ll see...) Whatever prosperity we have is in
spite of, not because of, fiat dollars.
Had that commie moron FDR been impeached and put in prison for merely *suggesting*
the confiscation of gold back in the 1930s (let alone his other crimes, creation
of the BATF, etc.), the Depression would have been ended much sooner, the growth
of the 1950s and later would have been genuine and sustained, government would
be much smaller and less intrusive, far fewer resources would have been squandered,
and the world, quite simply, would be better off.
Instead, we have skyrocketing inflation, which causes prices to rise, forcing
minimum wages to rise, thus creating yet more inflation. This makes a mockery
of trying to save for the future, so instead we over-consume resources. And
why not? It is not as if there will be a tomorrow worth living in.
Inflation literally destroys money, as it introduces such distortions into
the communications between markets and customers that it becomes impossible
to “deploy a wider front”. Hence, inflation ultimately destroys
civilizations. Just ask the Romans! They can tell you exactly what happens.
“The more things change, the more they remain insane.” - Bill Bonner,
The Daily Reckoning, 11/10/05
One of the problems is that, while the Laws of Economics are as ironclad and
brutal as the ones that govern physics, the results can be delayed - sometimes
for years, decades, or even generations! Picture Wile E. Coyote, chasing poor
Roadrunner, and missing his seemingly hapless and going straight-along right
off a precipice. He sails on, looking back, plotting how to get himself turned
around to catch the Roadrunner, when, suddenly, he realizes he is no longer
upon terra firma. Then he looks up, holds up a sign saying “Uh-oh” or
something like that, and then plummets downward. That’s about we are
at right now. There is no way to run back to the cliff; we are way past that
point. Only the Abyss awaits us
The distortions we are seeing now had most of their roots with the creation
of the Fed in 1913 - some 92 years ago! Heck, all of those who made these monstrous
decisions are long since dead and buried (and, hopefully, roasting in Hell).
But their evil legacy lives on.
When you start down the road of fiat inflation and the false prosperity it
creates, you bring into being certain unrealistic and false expectations. At
the time, Social Security struck people as a good idea (yes, I would argue
even without hindsight that it was a remarkably stupid idea, but then I am
a good deal smarter than 99.99% of the rest of humanity. And those who actually
know me would recoil in horror at such a revelation, given that my IQ is such
a low benchmark.) but with the dramatic increase in life expectancy and equally
dramatic decrease in fertility rates, to say nothing of the loss of wealth
creation ability (i.e. manufacturing, etc.) there is literally NO WAY this
can be sustained. It is obvious that it is just economically impossible - the
realities WILL catch up at some point. And then there will be HELL to pay.
But the problem is, no one can conceive of a way out. Getting rid of the social
welfare system is deemed “too cruel” to the parasites that benefit
from it – there would be so much “suffering.” What the well
meaning but irretrievably stupid people who espouse this fail to realize is
that, by delaying the inevitable you only make things immeasurably worse -
ESPECIALLY for those they are claiming to be “helping”.
*******************************
In a sane society folks who suggest implementing a fiat currency (or gun control,
for that matter) would be laughed out of polite company, and regarded as mental
and moral cripples. Such loathsome creatures would be ostracized until they
educated themselves as to why it is such a fantastically bad idea, and then
formally apologized to all and sundry for their appalling lapse in rudimentary
logic and reason. Those holding public office who actively attempted to do
such would simply be dragged out of their offices and publicly hanged (after,
naturally, a beating remarkable in its savagery and thoroughness), with their
bodies left to rot in the open as an object lesson for the next ten generations
that some ideas are simply purely evil in and of themselves.
When I become Master of the Dark Side of the Force, there will be some changes
in the way things are run... (“Oh Mighty Sith Lord, I have a proposal
to print paper mon-- ack! Cough! ACK!!! ..... ‘I find your lack of common
sense... disturbing....’ *thud*) - G.F.L.
James;
I was looking at the Texas State Department of Health and Human Services home
page this morning and saw a link to their state plan for a flu pandemic.
I thought our fellow readers might like to take a look. Probably would be
a good idea for us all to see what each of our states have in mind for us.
Here is the URL: http://www.dshs.state.tx.us/idcu/disease/influenza/pandemic/
Long Life, - "Overhill"
"Proximus sum egomet mihi." ("Charity begins at home.") - Publius Terentius Afer ("Terence"), Andria (Act IV, sec. 1, 12)
Note from JWR: Today we feature another entry for
the SurvivalBlog
non-fiction writing contest. The deadline for entries is November
28th. Get your entry in soon ! The writer of the best article will
win a four day course certificate at Front
Sight! (An up to $2,000 value.)
Reduce, re-use, and recycle. This article addresses intelligent consumerism
for the new survivalist. You've heard it many times before: you get
what you pay for. As consumers in a global economy we have more choices
than ever, but perhaps not as many wise choices. Imported junk fills
the shelves of many stores and being a smart consumer is not as easy
as knowing a few brand names. Once upon a time you had a general sense
of quality by the brand name of a product but the new global economy
has made brand names largely irrelevant outside their use as a marketing
tool. If you want to be a discriminating consumer in the modern age
you need to ask yourself; what is this item worth? Is a knife
worth $6.95 because you can always run to the store and by a replacement,
or should a knife be worth $75 because you will never need a
replacement? The smart consumer will chose the latter. Granted we can't
all afford to buy "the best", but nearly everyone can afford
to be a smart consumer. It is wise to place the proper value on things
we need. As survivalists we
need to think beyond our next trip to the store or the bargain of the day.
We need to think long term and we are all aware that many, many things in our
society are built for the short term. From the latest plasma television, to
disposable razors, to tennis shoes, these things are not going to be here for
long. Many high-tech items are not made to be repaired at all, if something
happens and it is out of warranty it must simply be discarded and replaced.
A time will come when simple replacement is out of the question - so choose
wisely.
I recently decided to see how long a "disposable" razor would last.
I shaved with it once a week for six months! It's nice to know I can get a
lot of use out of a disposable item if needed. Yet to too many people it's
a single use "disposable" item. I have broken regular non-disposable
razors as well, after hitting them against the side of the sink many, many
times, so I know they won't last all that long either. Short of an actual straight
razor, they are all basically "disposable" items. I'm not an earth-hugging-greenie-weenie
mind you but I don't much care for our "disposable society" attitude
either. Firstly it is wasteful of money and resources, and secondly it is unwise
especially for anyone concerned with their long term survival.
How many things do you throw away every day? How many of those things can be
re-used? We can reduce our use of packaging by buying food in bulk quantities.
We can reduce our use of natural resources by buying quality first and cost
second. We can reuse many items like plastic bread bags and water bottles,
and we can recycle almost anything.
The way that I shop is by first looking at where something is made. As a general
rule I don't support communists so about half of all goods in any given store
are off limits because they are made in communist China. I realize that many
times I don't really have a choice and my kids do need shoes so I pretty much
have to get shoes made in China for them. For adults we can still find shoes
made elsewhere, but I haven't seen the same options for kids. If I can find
what I want and it is not made in a communist country then I can compare quality,
features, and value. Too often cost is an overriding factor for many people
and I try not to fall into that trap, I prefer to shop for value. To do this
I ask: how important is this item to my/our survival? If it is truly a needed
item and not simply a luxury I can justify nearly any cost to make sure that
I get a quality item that will perform as needed and have a long service life.
Luxury items like an auto-drip coffee maker are of far less importance in our
household than any survival plans. By being smart consumers and thinking about
ways to reduce / re-use / recycle, we are enforcing good practices that
will help ensure our long term survival. Survival for us is not just about
being prepared, but being well prepared, not just about having the stuff,
but knowing how to use it, and not just talking about surviving a long term
crisis or TEOTWAWKI but by implementing intelligent, purpose driven strategies
in
our everyday life that make a difference. - "A. Friend"
There was an interesting thread of conversation over on The
FALFiles Forums about the U.S. 90% silver coinage that was minted
up to 1964. The thread began:
>
Talk about coincidence, I was given two silver quarters im my change
from a local McDonalds [the] day
> before yesterday. I knew there was something
good in all that change as soon as she dropped
>
it into my hand
by the distinct difference in sound the old coins made, the cashier
never
batted an eye.
>I got one 1965 quarter in very good shape and one 1942 quarter
that looks as though it went around the world,
>its very worn.
The thread later continued:
>> $1,000 worth of dimes, quaters and half dollars contained 723.4 ounces
of
>>silver when minted.
>
Because of wear most have less silver now
I replied:
That is correct. Most coin dealers assume that a $1,000 face value
bag of circulated pre-1965 coins has just 715 ounces of silver, due
to wear. That is assuming typical wear for a bag that is composed
of nearly one-half of the coins with a 1964 mint date (the largest--and
last--minting year of 90% silver
coins), and a mix of earlier dates. A lot of the really early quarters
(such as Walking Liberty quarters) in a typical bag are so badly
worn that you can hardly read the dates. A bag of those woudl probbaly
have
less than 700 ounces of silver.
So, assuming 715 ounces of silver at the current spot price of $8.12
per ounce, that makes a $1,000 face value bag worth $5,805, wholesale.
(Or just think of it as about 5.8 times face value.)
As for the date confusion: The proper term is "Pre-1965"--coins
with a mint date of 1964 or earlier. All of the dimes and quarters
minted in and after 1965 show a copper edge--they are a phoney sandwich
("clad") copper token rather than a proper silver coin.
It is no wonder hat they drove the old 90% coins out of circulation
so
quickly. There was quite a coin shoratge from 1965 ot 1967.
The 1965-to-1970 Kennedy half dollars are not clad coinages. They
are a debased 40% silver alloy. BTW, I still occassionally find those
circulating (rarely) in
rural areas. They mainly get back into circulation via schoolchildren
who break into the wrong piggy bank, and don't know the difference.
(Probably the same source as those quarters from McDonald's.)
I recommend that folks get their "beans, bullets and band-aids" squared
way first. Then, you might want to purchase one $1,000 junk
silver bag per adult family member, for barter purposes. Above and
beyond that, any "investment" silver should probably be
in the form of 1,000 ounce Englehard or Johnson-Matthey serialized
silver bars.
That is the least expensive (lowest premium) way to buy bullion silver
that does not require an assay upon resale.
OBTW, if you have the storage space, I strongly recommend silver
over gold. I believe that silver is far more likely to double or
triple
in price than gold. (It isn't very far from $8 to $16, but psychologically
it is a lot farther from $490 to $980!)
I still predict silver at $40+ per ounce by the end of the second
term of the Bush administration.
A HF network is a
good idea. A local network also has its merits. There are lots of
methods and frequencies for local area usage. Some use military surplus
equipment, some CBs,
some ham, some TA-1 field
phones with wire, some use Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi)
access points (a great idea if you've planned ahead for electricity
and it actually works.). I know three people in Colorado who use
old solid satellite dishes to be able to stand on their hills and
talk to each other over several miles using a normal speaking voice.
Must be strange facing away from someone several miles away and having
a conversation. It works surprisingly well, but I was told that the
rare scream of a hawk flying between the dishes can be slightly unnerving.
Many people aren't aware that the Atlanta, Georgia ham community
has a city wide internet that's not part of the [International] Internet.
All courtesy of Wi-Fi. Now that's an interesting concept. Voice,
Phone, Data and Video on a parallel internet. Kinda like the Fed,
huh?
Lots of ideas and most are good for their particular arena. But here's the but).
But HF can link the continent together so you know what is
happening all the way across the continent, even to the other end of the continent.
It beats restricting yourself to only knowing what's going on 20, 40 or 60
miles away.(Not to mention talking worldwide or just listening worldwide, Hmmm?).
Check out http://www.matf.org/albums/grc215.htm to
acquire an idea of how the government planned to use HF to provide trans and
post attack communications among nuclear capable units in the European Theater
and then applied the concept for use in CONUS for FEMA.
Excellent idea overall. {For example,] I look forward to seeing where people
suggest landing. One suggestion might be similar to the HF Backpack net, all USB.
Geared to HF with less than 20 watts and the ability to carry it on your back
while talking on the radio. Rough times? Conservative power requirement! Excellent
capability. Perhaps someone will show up there and suggest moving to a quieter
spot to start a discussion?
OBTW, the web page cited above states the units could regularly communicate over 400 miles. Not quite accurate! From Colorado, I regularly talk to San Francisco, San Diego, Maine, and Georgia [the U.S. state]--all from this little radio which fits in a flight bag. It is 20 watts and has a 10 foot vertical whip antenna powered by a 28 volt, 7 amp battery which I can (and do) recharge with solar cells. And it's about the same size as the venerable PRC-77! Best Regards, - The Army Aviator
"The true danger is when liberty is nibbled away, for expedients, and by parts." - Edmund Burke
Howdy Mr. Rawles!
One frequency [band] that I have had good results from has been 6 meters. This
frequency is really unique. It may not be suitable for every situation,
however its properties can be of use. It has the ability to become a national
frequency when the E layer of the atmosphere is active. I have talked to
HAMs from Washington state, to San Francisco, California down through Texas,
the Cayman Islands, the Turks and Caicos Islands, Haiti, parts of South
America, Vermont and above the Arctic Circle in Canada, [and] among adjacent
states.
Lets just say I am on the opposite side of the country from Washington
State and California. I did these contacts on a wire sloper antenna cut
for the mid portion of the 6 meter band. One day I will get my 5-element
beam
antenna
up which should at least triple my [long range propagation] capabilities.
Six Meters has the ability to use AM, FM, SSB (upper
and lower) and is repeater system capable. I actually talked for thirty
minutes to a fellow in Mississippi on the AM side (which I rarely use).
I was just goofing around on AM just to see who was transmitting, if anyone,
and I heard his CQ. I have
collected QSL cards from all
the varying points I have made contact. Granted, 6-meters is subject to
atmospherics and sun spot cycles, but it does offer a very private local
and potential national and international communications capability. I have
heard stations from Spain as well as Africa, but I did not have a path
back to them. Once I was monitoring 6 meters and heard a conversation from
two other HAMs, one located in Texas and another in Cuba! The fellow in
Cuba had to have been a higher up in the government as the conversation
turned toward atmospheric science. The Cuban mentioned that he was monitoring,
yes monitoring, the progression of an E layer cloud that was passing over
parts of central Texas. He mentioned that a particular path to South America
should open up and the HAM in Texas could make a contact in South America
to get a QSL card. It would
take the cloud about 20 minutes to move into position. Sure enough about
20 minutes later I started hearing the Texas HAM making CQ calls to a station
he could hear in South America. Now the very interesting thing is this.
For the Cuban operator, who was doing HAM work while at work, to "see" an
E layer cloud over central Texas; he had to be sitting at an over the horizon
radar station. Leastwise, this is the only thing I could figure. This means
that in all likelihood he was military. So my question has always been, "What
else, other than atmospheric research, would Cuba need over the horizon
radar for? Makes you go, "Hmmmm." The six-meter band should be
on the list for monitoring of atmospherics at least, and a potential communications
band. Other frequencies such as 10 meters are more "stable" in
many ways. But what I have noticed is when 6 meters becomes active for
distance communication, the other bands 'open up' shortly after. If my
memory serves me, I think 6 meters can be used for data (NOS or
Packet) communications. I don't have my ARRL Handbook
handy to look it up for sure, perhaps someone else knows for sure offhand.
Speaking of Packet and NOS, lets not leave these out also. It could be quite
useful to connect computers into a 'chat' mode or a BBS as
the old original text based BBS were in the early days of computer communications
when you had to dial directly into a server to post messages, etc. For those
old enough to know about Fido[net] and other BBS Programs, these too would
offer a point to point BBS provided the grid is not totally down or has been
fried
by EMP. Check Hamfests for good
used equipment as well as eBay. These "fallback" technologies
aren't as pretty and slick as all the bells and whistles of the Internet today,
but they do offer a method of communication that does not have a lot of equipment
overhead. Granted they are slower than the Internet today, but so long as the
word gets through; that accomplishes the mission. A patchwork quilt approach
to communications where one area relays information via Packet or NOS to another
area so it can forward that information via voice or morse (yes, MORSE CODE)
and back to a different Packet station is what we are looking at. Yes I said
that bad word Morse code. It is the only method that you can transmit on 1/10th
of a watt on a particular frequency and reach around the world. I had a HAM
buddy who was my Elmer (volunteer who helps a new person interested in HAM)
sit at my kitchen table with a transmitter he built in a sardine can. He used
a short wave radio as the receiver. We sat there and with him using Morse code
he 'talked' [in manual morse code] to a HAM in Siberia. This was long before
the fall of the USSR. The Siberian HAM had built the 'sardine can transmitter'
on the sly from spare parts that he had scrounged. And since it operated on
such low wattage and used Morse code, which takes way less power than voice
to travel around the world, it was hard for the 'authorities' to find him.
Hence information from behind the Iron Curtain could get out regardless of
the government's best efforts to prevent it.
[JWR adds: HF transmissions propagate with near
vertical incidence skywaves, which are nearly impossible to locate
via traditional
radio direction finding. Yes, there is my old favorite, the Track
Wolf HF-DF system, but that requires a much longer tale
that I'll reserve for a subsequent blog post. And the full story will
have to wait for declassification, probably sometime late in the century.]
Mobility may also be most valuable. Having a HF rig in a mobile platform
(car, boat, etc.) makes it difficult to locate. During the invasion into
Kuwait by Iraq, a HAM in a van managed to get information out to the rest
of the world while constantly moving and keeping messages short. Basically
he followed the snipers rule. One shot, then he moves to another location,
and takes another shot or transmission in his case. You can get devious about
things also. With the data capability why not integrate the use of PGP or
other encryption software along with packet, a Network Operating System (NOS),
or even over voice. So long as the person you intend to transmit to has the
encryption key to decrepit the message. That person passes information along
to another node in the net under his or her own unique key. No one could
decode it. But you would have to remember about RDF (radio direction finding)
if things were real hot. Follow the sniper's rules.
If you are new to HAM Radio or want to start, then find the 'old heads' who
have a very broad knowledge of radios. Even tube radio repair will be a useful
skill to learn (tube radios aren't subject to EMP as long as they don't have
any integrated circuits, but they will suck power like there is no tomorrow.)
Also check out an ARRL Handbook and look into the Amateur Satellite Radio aspect.
The problem is with EMP, but I have no idea how EMP would affect the satellites
themselves. But Sats can also be utilized for particular situations. Amateur
Television can be utilized to monitor your property or remote areas, but there
again EMP is your enemy. And if properly put together they can be run off Solar
Panels with battery backups.
Explore the totality of HAM, it offers a lot. If you are an 'old head' in HAM,
become an Elmer. [A mentor to beginners.] If you want to learn more about the
capabilities of HAM, check the ARRL website for ARRL clubs listed near you http://www.arrl.org/.
Most HAMs are geared toward disaster communications instead of "rachetjawing" all
day. When there is a disaster, you will find a HAM trying to get the information
out. OBTW, Another interesting technology that was pioneered by HAMs is communication
via laser for point to point communications. There was a club out west that
was experimenting with utilizing laser communications between two distant mountains
or mesas. This area would be ideal for such communications because of the lack
of humidity and pollutants in the air. Dust may be a problem but I never heard
of any. I don't remember the name of the club but will try to find out through
my HAM buddies. The use of IR laser
would make it invisible except for NVGs.
Going on the concept of 'burst' communications may provide another
mode for communications in some areas. From what my Elmer told me
about 20 years ago, they were having some pretty darn good reliability.
So with today's technology it should draw much less power and be
viable. Granted, it won't be for every sector of the country but
may become part of the patchwork quilt communications we have to
rely on.
73s, - The Rabid One
JWR Replies: Remember that we are presently on the down slope of the 11 year solar cycle, so don't depend on reliable 6 meter propagation via the sporadic E-layer skip.
"If I can recognize the danger at long range, I’ll deactivate it from a safe distance. The rifle is one of the better long range danger deactivators." - Jim Woods.
Note from JWR: Pardon me for getting off topic
"chasing rabbits", but I will be posting some more articles
and letters on secure communications, encryption, and privacy
in
next the
couple
of days. Encryption and cryptanalysis have been interests of mine
for many years--even before I was an ASA officer.
I hope that you can appreciate the utility of secure communications in
retreat planning
and in organizing survival teams. If not, well then humor me...
In the absence of computing power if we are reduced to using tiny QRP [low power] transmitters for communication, then there may come a time where some messages require heavy duty encryption. This is the easiest method I know of the Solitaire card deck encryption method. A group could even generate one time pads which would be starting order for a deck and store them in a secure location. See: http://www.schneier.com/solitaire.html Here is a snip from this site:
"In Neal Stephenson's novel Cryptonomicon, the character Enoch Root describes a cryptosystem code-named "Pontifex" to another character named Randy Waterhouse, and later reveals that the steps of the algorithm are intended to be carried out using a deck of playing cards. These two characters go on to exchange several encrypted messages using this system. The system is called "Solitaire" (in the novel, "Pontifex" is a code name intended to temporarily conceal the fact that it employs a deck of cards) and I designed it to allow field agents to communicate securely without having to rely on electronics or having to carry incriminating tools. An agent might be in a situation where he just does not have access to a computer, or may be prosecuted if he has tools for secret communication. But a deck of cards...what harm is that?"
[See the URL cited above, for the details on this enciphering
system]
JWR Replies: Thanks for sending that, David.
In the near future I plan to post a brief article
about
"book
codes"
--using
two identical books as one-time pads. This method is called a Buchspiel ("book
game") by the German spymasters that perfected it.
Jim, I wanted to add that I think it is a great time now to test for Amateur radio license ("Ham" radio.) The entry level test is apparently quite simple and there is no longer any requirement for morse code (although that is a good skill to acquire.) [JWR adds: IIRC, that applies only to "No Code" license classifications, which have band restrictions.] I have been routinely listening to 75 meters at night, here in Coeur d'Alene {Idaho.] I here people as far as San Diego, California. Those broadcasting within 800 miles (Nevada, Oregon and all over the northwest) come in so clear and strong it seems as if they are down the street!) Most of these fellows willing to help out and share their knowledge. This is a lot different from CB radio where there is usually so much vulgarity and bad behavior it makes you want to keep that radio turned off. There are plenty of amateur radio clubs that are willing to help people out (the Spokane area alone has 10 or more clubs). A visit to the American Radio Relay League (ARRL) web site [www.arrl.org] will provide tons of info. If people are serious about surviving any type of calamity then the ability to communicate is going to be vital. Best Regards, - Jason in North Idaho
Hi Jim,
I’m writing to see if you, or any of your readers, have any input re:
Springfield Armory’s M1A SOCOM.
I am considering putting one on layaway as a bugout rifle, but have read mixed
reviews. I seem to remember that I saw a recommendation on SurvivalBlog to
dispense with the full size version (my MBR)
and go with the SOCOM, but I can’t find it. Any info you could provide
would be greatly appreciated.
Mr. Rawles:
Regarding the by another SurvivalBlog reader that mentioned that she had purchased Nano mask: They have major flaw, so I'd rather choose [a full mask with] 95 filters: The Nano mask offers NO EYE PROTECTION. Think about it, if it can get into your mouth or nose, it'll get into your eyes too.
Secondly, [swimming] pool grade diatomaceous earth will work too, contrary to what the website says. (I used to own a pool building business for nine years.. - Tamryn
JWR Replies: I agree with both of your points. There are differences between natural diatomaceous earth and the heat-treated (calcined) diatomaceous earth that is used for swimming pool filtration. Swimming pool diatomaceous earth can have a higher crystalline silica content (about 60%) and could be dangerous if taken internally. But it is still fine fro virtually all of the other typical uses--and the markup per pound can be 1000% higher for "store bought" diatomaceous earth. Any other touted difference consists primarily of packaging, marketing, and a bigger mark-up.So I recommend that you buy just a small quantity of "food grade" diatomaceous earth, and a much larger supply of typical swimming pool diatomaceous earth for killing pests and for water filtration. OBTW, diatomaceous earth has 101 uses around the house: You can uses it to kill insects as a non-toxic alternative to poisons, in water filtration, hydroponics, to dust your chickens for mites, et cetera.
Hello Jim,
I saw the post on the blog about the Nano Mask and had to write in to offer
some concerns about this system for LONG-TERM usage during an Avian Flu
outbreak.
First, as their own web site discloses, if the Nano Mask filtered anything
smaller than .027 microns then you would not be able to breath through it as
the filter pores would be too small to handle the air flow of our inhalations.
So, what they are telling us is that this “nano” filter media ultra-fine
filter. Keep that in mind as I discuss the concerns I have…
Nano-Mask concern #1:
The Nano-Mask does not have an EXHALATION VALVE! This means,
as their web site confirms, that both air coming IN (inhalation) and air going
OUT (exhalation)
are both equally filtered through the nano filter media. Unless I have someone
in my household that has a weakened immune system, why on earth would I want
to FILTER the air coming out of my lungs? Moreover, if properly prepared for
a flu pandemic, my home would be a “CLEAN” area where the donning
of protective masks would not be needed. Therefore, the only time I will need
respiratory protection is when I go out where public contact may or will be
expected, so why, again, would I want to filter my exhalations? This makes
no sense for “survivalist-type” scenarios…
Nano-Mask concern #2:
MOISTURE!!! Since the nano mask has no exhalation valve and filters both inhalations
and exhalations, all that hot, moist air I am exhaling is now DIRECTLY IMPACTING
the nano filter media. Add in heavy breathing from physical exertion or stress
and you are talking about a huge moisture problem! Unless specifically designed
to do so, such as a water filter, moisture DESTROYS a filters ability to operate
properly by CLOGGING the filter media with water. Gas mask filters are a great
example! There is not a gas mask filter anywhere that I know of that works
properly when WET, which is why ALL quality gas masks have EXHALATION VALVES.
Think about that!
Nano-Mask concern #3:
SMALL FILTER MEDIA! Take a look at the Nano Mask replaceable filter media;
it is a small triangular patch that mounts on a mask assembly. Since the Nano
Mask does DOUBLE DUTY by filtering air coming in and air going out, this ultra-fine
filter media will CLOG UP at least TWICE AS FAST as a comparable mask with
an exhalation valve. Add in the moisture variable from your exhalations upon
a small filter media and you have serious EFFECTIVE FILTER LIFESPAN issues!
In conclusion, the Nano filter technology is very promising, but let us keep
in mind that the H5N1 virus
is not like a “weapons-grade” biological
agent as it always needs a CARRIER, such as water droplets (spit, tears, mucous
or phlegm) or airborne dust where these water droplets attach themselves. This
small virus IS NOT just floating around in the air by itself! Since this small
virus, just like the common flu, is always attached to a LARGER PARTICLE, the
CDC and WHO are
justified in promoting N95 filters as effective protection from the H5N1 virus.
Lets be real; does anyone really think the CDC and WHO would send in their
staff, researchers, nurses and doctors into an H5N1 hot
zone without EFFECTIVE protection? THEY are the ones who know the threat, not
a company trying to market their masks to a fearful public with misleading
information and a questionable product for the intended application.
I think your readers should be aware of the DOWNSIDE to the Nano-Mask as very
few think and analyze the LONG-TERM feasibility of a protection product. I
personally am recommending to friends and family, similar to the CDC and WHO,
any N95 or N100/P100 mask with an EXHALTION VALVE (I like the 3M 9211 N95 mask)
combined with lab-quality, shielded eye protection. In a truly contaminated
environment (hospital during pandemic), I would not consider myself safe unless
I was wearing full-face protection (eyes, nose, mouth) with HEPA filtration
that a good quality military gas mask would provide (I like the Canadian C4
or Scott M95). Then comes DECON.
Baruch HaShem Yahweh, - Robert
"The greatest thing in the world is to know how to be self-sufficient." - Michel Eyquem De Montaigne (1533-1592), French Philosopher and Essayist
I've been asked by several readers for their advice on cellular phones. First, I should mention that the cellular revolution still hasn't made its way to the Rawles Ranch. Perhaps it never will. I'd appreciate your e-mails with comments on this topic. (As a non-cellular kinda guy, I will surely leave out some important points.)
The general rules of thumb on cellular phones are as follows:
All cellular phones are vulnerable to interception--some are just a bit more secure than others. There is no privacy with a cell phone--or in essence with any other radio transmitter. None. Don't kid yourself. Take my word on it--back when I was an intelligence officer, what I did for a living was supervise troops that did primarily did voice intercept and direction finding. Please don't write to tell me that you saw on television that characters from The Sopranos use encrypted cell phones to talk with their mob buddies. Yes, it is possible, but there are three big problems with this: 1.) It is illegal for private Citizens to do so. 2.) Doing so will instantly raise your profile in the eyes of authorities. Instead of being just one nondescript cell phone emitter in an ocean of emitters, your cell phone will suddenly become an "signal of interest." (SOI) 3.) Even an encrypted signal can still be DFed.
Regardless of the type of cell phone that you use, if you remove its battery pack then it cannot be tracked. It ceases to be an emitter. (Without a battery it will not even produce local oscillator noise.)
Privacy and anonymity are worthy goals, but consider that their may be situations where you will want to have your location known--such as when you are calling 911 in the event of a car accident, or in a wilderness rescue/medevac situation. IMHO, to the ideal solution would be a cell phone on which you can selectively disable the GPS circuitry.
When the U.S. FCC mandated "Enhanced 911" ("E911"-- a.k.a. cell phone tracking), they set a standard for direction finding (DF) accuracy, but they left the method implementation up to the major cellular service providers. Some providers chose location schemes that depend on GPS chips. Others use time-of arrival radio direction finding. (The latter approach uses cell phone towers as the DF sites--creating a DF network with a very long baseline.) For details, see: http://www.edn.com/contents/images/198901.pdf Because of this diversity of approaches, there are still many "loophole" cell phones that cannot be tracked or triangulated. These include pre-GPS phones or phones with their GPS receiver disabled, subscribed in Sprint, Verizon, or Nextel service plan. But be advised that there is essentially no way to avoid tracking if your cellular provider employs time-of arrival radio direction finding. Do some research the next time that you change cellular providers.
The other important aspect of cellular phone privacy is protecting your identity. Most cellular phone service plans require that you provide detailed billing information, a physical street address, and a credit card number. But what about those nifty "pre-paid" cell phones that you can buy at you local drug store? For now at least, most pre-paid cell phones can be purchased anonymously. They only lose their anonymity if and when you "recharge" their minutes with a credit card. (OBTW, I'll discuss anonymous credit cards in a future SurvivalBlog post. But here is a hint to get you started: the Simon's Mall chain sells anonymous pre-paid VISA debit cards.)
For more information, see: http://www.pcworld.com/howto/article/0,aid,114721,00.asp and http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/47369
Here is a good military level primer on HF radio propagation with some links
on how to make improvised antennas. See:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/fm/7-93/Appd.htm
For more fun, try Googling on the search phrase: "stealth, apartment,
and wire antennas." There
is an amazing science behind these home-built wonders.
Jim:
A few items that are of concern/interest to me as of late
are topics that others have brought up. Don't forget that disabling
OnStar may be obtainable, but I surmise that disabling your cell phone
would be patently dangerous in a slow slide or SHTF scenario.
Learn [the details about] your cell phone, and VOTE WITH YOUR EAR!
(Had to get that in there
Jim!) I presume that handheld or vehicular mounted GPS systems
would also create some sort of signature or locale while in operation.
Is
this of noteworthiness? The last unit I bought, I purchased without
any registration or anything. I assume if you subscribe to a service
then
by definition it has its "eyes upon you."
Another item that I seek your expertise on is how to obtain an "annual
stockpile" of
necessary prescriptions. How do you recommend that your like minded blog readers
go about this process? My last purchase of cold medication resulted in the showing
of my I.D. before I could obtain it. I hesitate to think this is an easily remedied
issue. Take Care, - The Wanderer
JWR Replies:
On cellular phones: Coincidentally, I addressed these issues in another blog post that is also running today. (Wednesday, November 23, 2005.)
On GPS receivers: Pardon the following side step into ASA arcana (one of my past lives): Any radio receiver creates what is called local oscillator noise--a very weak signature that can be detected by very sophisticated monitoring equipment. But from a practical standpoint, it cannot be pinpointed except if you are up against a serious DFing team with some very sophisticated equipment, and only then if you are in an electromagnetic quiet zone such as out in the middle of a National Forest. Anywhere else, the local oscillator noise will get lost in the ambient clutter. So you can safely assume that a passive GPS receiver by itself is not a threat to your privacy. But when a GPS receiver is integrated with a cellular phone (which is of course an active transmitter), you can kiss your location privacy goodbye.
On prescription meds: It is a pity that most doctors in the urban and suburban portions of the U.S. don't have the same mentality that is prevalent in Alaska and the more remote regions of the intermountain west. Here in the hinterboonies, many doctors are accustomed to getting requests for full-year prescriptions from ranchers, miners, bush pilots, and others that live out far beyond the sidewalks. Unless you have a relative that is an M.D., all that I can suggest is that you hunt around for a preparedness-minded doctor. Perhaps someone at church, or in your local shooting club. OBTW, I've heard that most LDS ("Mormon") doctors are sympathetic to their patients that are survival-minded. As far as insurance company reimbursement goes: Good luck! Many insurance companies refuse pay for more than a three month supply.
Recently seen in The Washington Times was an article touting Frank Gaffney's new book, in which he cites EMP as a major threat that could kill millions--by starvation. See: http://www.washtimes.com/national/20051121-103434-8775r.htm
"The first rule in investing: don't lose any money. The second rule: don't forget the first rule." - Warren Buffett
The folks over at Military.com report that the U.S. military just announced the recall of more than 18,000 Interceptor Body Armor (IBA) vests because they did not meet ballistic test standards when the body armor was made. This is the second body armor recall announced this year. The recall affects only the outer tactical vest and its soft inserts, made by Point Blank Body Armor Inc. of Florida, and not the ceramic insert that also is used in the armor. Among the eight lots of body armor being recalled, more than 10,000 vests went to the Marines and more than 8,000 went to the Army. These vest procurement lots date back to up to five years ago. See: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,80768,00.html?ESRC=dod.nl
Jim:
A good frequency for two-way radio communications is the little-used
[amateur] FM radio band on 220
MHz. (See: http://wireless.fcc.gov/220MHz/) Very few scanners
cover it--only the most expensive scanners do which most people won't
buy. The reason scanners don't cover 200 - 300 MHz is because
its [mainly] used by the military. For example, the control tower at Moffett
Field Naval Air Station is on 301.something MHz.
In my research, I noticed
that there are
only two repeaters in Idaho
that are on 220 and they are both in Boise. Outside of the big cities
220 is hardly used. One exception is the Condor Net (www.condor-connection.org),
which covers Nevada, California and Arizona. It is the only repeater
network of its kind in the US. And it's only available on 220MHz.
I used 223.480 MHz simplex for many years. The
comment
from the guys that used [this band] was that it was like their private "intercom" because
it
was so quiet until someone got on and started talking. The user community on
220 is
so small that everyone knows everyone on a first name basis. The range
is
as good
as
2 meters
and the
noise
floor
is
very
low. Sparking electrical equipment does not effect 220 like it does 2 meters.
There are still
plenty
of
good radios are around for 220. Kenwood, Icom, Alinco, ADI, Midland and even
Cobra made a few.
Right now there are two Midland cyrstal-controlled 220 radios on eBay ready to
go. Excellent radios and there are plenty of parts [like custom crystals] available.
(Hint, hint) They last forever.
If you are looking for almost secure communications and excellent range, then
220 is the way to go. It is not uncommon to make contacts to Donner Summit [of
the
Sierra
Nevada mountains] with
only
25
watts from the [San Francisco] Bay Area. A few 220 radios were made all-mode,
including
single sideband (SSB)
and
they
are still around and still used. BTW, most of the people who own this scarce
variety
refuse
to
part
with
them.
-
Fred the Valmet-meister
JWR Replies: I wonder how difficult it would be to set up a dedicated 220 MHz repeater network in the western states, preferably all with net stations that use photovoltaic power. If the infrastructure would be too expensive, perhaps it would be best to just stick to HF .
James:
I think the proposal by David in Israel is like a dream come
true for us that are new to the preparation meditation. I would love
to
be a part of the "frequency" network whether it be in using,
or somehow helping out with the development, (albeit mostly inept experience
in "radioing") I for one would feel so much less alone if
something were to happen and I knew that I could search for some sort
of consortium in a TEOTWAWKI scenario. Take Care, and a Sincere
Thank You!, - The Wanderer
Hi Jim:
Great to see young new people trying to start practical
preparations. One cup of FOOD GRADE diatomaceous earth per five gallon
bucket will keep the bugs out. All of my stuff is already in nitro
packed buckets with oxygen absorbers, but someday we might not be able
to
get dry ice and O2 absorbers for
packing grains, so I just ordered some diatomaceous earth myself.
See: http://www.internet-grocer.net/diatome.htm
[The other topic that I wanted mention is] "Nano masks." Mine
just got shipped to me via UPS. I ordered them a month ago. Far more effective
than
N-95 [filter]s. See: http://www.2hdistributors.com/index/mn20442/bird_flu_home\
- God bless, Lyn
"Charity never humiliated him who profited from it, nor ever bound him by the chains of gratitude, since it was not to him but to God that the gift was made." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery