« Letter Re: Advanced Medical Training and Facilities for Retreat Groups |Main| Letter Re: As It Was in the Days of Noah »

Friday May 9 2008

Louisiana Sales Tax Holiday for Hurricane Preparedness--May 24 & 25

Residents of the US state of Louisiana can purchase needed items free of sales tax as they prepare for the 2008 hurricane season.
The inaugural 2008 Hurricane Preparedness Sales Tax Holiday takes place on Saturday, May 24 and Sunday, May 25. The holiday is an annual, statewide event created by the Louisiana Legislature to assist families with the important job of protecting their lives and property in the event of a serious storm.
During the two-day holiday, tax-free purchases are allowed for the first $1,500 of the sales price on each of the following items:
• Self-powered light sources, such as flashlights and candles;
• Portable self-powered radios, two-way radios, and weather-band radios;
• Tarpaulins or other flexible waterproof sheeting;
• Ground anchor systems or tie-down kits;
• Gas or diesel fuel tanks;
• Batteries – AAA, AA, C, D, 6-volt, or 9-volt (automobile batteries and boat batteries are not eligible);
• Cellular phone batteries and chargers;
• Non-electric food storage coolers;
• Portable generators;
• Storm shutter devices – Materials and products manufactured, rated, and marketed specifically for the purposes of preventing window damage from storms (La. R.S. 47:305.58).
The 2008 Hurricane Preparedness Sales Tax holiday begins at 12:01 a.m. on Saturday, May 24, and ends at 11:59 p.m. on Sunday, May 25.
The sales tax holiday does not extend to hurricane-preparedness items or supplies purchased at any airport, public lodging establishment or hotel, convenience store, or entertainment complex.
For more information, visit the State of Louisiana web site.

« Odds 'n Sods: |Main| Note from JWR: »

Sunday May 4 2008

Spotlight Falls on Silver's "Poor Fundamentals" by Jason Hommel

An article by Pratima Desai that was circulated by the Reuters news service, included this:

LONDON, April 28 (Reuters) - Investment money flooding into silver has overwhelmed poor fundamentals and helped it to outperform gold, but the tide could be turning for precious metals and the probability of large losses is rising.

THE REAL TRUTH IS:
Silver has outstanding fundamentals, and silver's downside is minimal, and, in fact, it probably just bottomed, as I will show.

Silver's price falls in percentage terms are likely to dwarf those seen in gold, which some fund managers say has stronger supply/demand fundamentals.

Again, the opposite is true, silver's supply/demand fundamentals are much better than for gold, as all the smart money knows, and as I will show.

"History shows that when you get a substantial correction in precious metals, silver falls more than gold ... It's a more volatile market and smaller in value terms," said Stephen Briggs, analyst at Societe Generale.

That's true, silver is more volatile, and in a bull market for silver, which we are in, silver will clearly outperform gold, as it has outperformed gold, as the silver to gold ratio is narrowing, from 80:1 to 50:1, and we have a long way to go to get to the historic 15:1 ratio, or we will likely exceed it, with silver moving even higher.

One big reason behind surging prices has been the tumbling dollar, making commodities priced in dollars cheaper for holders of other currencies. The weak dollar also prompts producers to raise prices to protect profit margins.

Silver producers do not have the luxury of raising prices. No commodity producer does. All commodities in the world are either sold at the spot price, or under long term contracts that have already been agreed upon, which, in this bull market, are usually at lower prices than today.

Last week the dollar fell to record lows against the Euro, to beyond $1.60, an event which has caused many to question whether further losses can be sustained and whether it has bottomed.
While the excess creation of paper money is one of the best factors for higher silver prices, the dollar's relation to the yen and Euro has almost nothing to do with it's relation to silver and gold prices. All paper money, the yen, Euro, and the dollar, are all falling against silver and gold, generally, since 2001 and that trend will continue.

"The dollar is not going to keep on depreciating forever," Briggs said. He expects gold prices to average around $900 an ounce next year from $1,025 this year and silver to average $15.50 compared with $19.20.

Well, actually, the dollar could keep on depreciating forever, as all paper currencies in all of human history have eventually done just that. It's silver and gold that cannot depreciate forever. Furthermore, these spokesmen from the large banks and brokers are always revising upwards their estimates of silver's future prices, and it's always behind where silver ends up going; I've seen this pattern for the last eight years now. Since when have the large banks or brokers called silver right? When did they advise you to ever get into this market to make several hundred percent since 2001? They never did. And now they want you to sell? They always want you to sell.

Financial uncertainty, which has underpinned precious metals since last August is to some extent becoming less important to investors seeking the higher returns stocks and bonds offer.
Stocks and bonds offering higher returns? Since when? Only if you go back 30 years, but not the last 8. The Dow/Gold ratio topped out in 2001 at about 56 and has narrowed down to about 14 now that gold has hit about $900.

With a weakened case for holding precious metals, prices have started to slip. Spot gold is now around $893 an ounce compared with a record high of $1,030.80 on March 17 and silver at $17 from a 27-year high of $21.24.

Weakened case for holding precious metals? What weakened case? They made no case. They didn't even get the facts right. The current dip in silver is probably the bottom, and now is probably the best time to buy!

Goldman Sachs recently said it expects to see gold prices at $835 an ounce in 12 months and silver at around $15.50.
Here's another investment bank revising their estimates upwards again, but making bearish calls. Hilarious. Pathetic. Bullish!

RECYCLING
From the end of last year to March 17, silver prices surged by more than 40 percent, while gold was up more than 20 percent. Silver's heftier gains were built on investor flows.
Absolutely. Investment demand for silver surged from 5% of annual mine supply to maybe about 8-10% of annual mine supply, we'll see soon.

Barclays iShares silver trust, the biggest silver exchange traded fund listed in the United States, now holds more than 5,770 tonnes of silver, a rise of about 10 percent since the end of last year.
Gold holdings by New York-listed StreetTracks Gold Shares, the world's biggest gold Exchange Traded Fund (ETF), stand at 591 tonnes, down about 5 percent since end-December.
I agree with those stats, but look at what they mean. With gold trading at about 50 times the price of silver, and the gold ETF holding more than 1/10th of the tonnes of the silver ETF, it means that about 5 times as many investment dollars went into the gold ETF.

"Silver is probably going to fall more than gold in percentage terms," said Wolfgang Wrzesniok-Rossbach, head of sales at German metals trading group Heraeus.
"From an industrial and jewelry point of view, there has clearly been a decline in demand. There has been a lot of additional material coming to the market in the form of scrap."
This "German metals trading group Heraeus" is not said to be either long or short. They could very well have short positions, and just inventing things. They appear to be a silver user, at first glance here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heraeus

More than 20,000 tonnes of silver were produced globally last year compared with around 2,500 tonnes of gold.
I agree with those stats. What is not said is that 160% of gold mine supply is purchased by investors each year or about 4,000 tonnes of gold. In stark contrast, about .07% of silver mine supply is purchased by investors each year, about 1,555 tonnes, or about 50 million ounces.

The surplus in the physical silver market is expected by some analysts to rise to around 2,500 tonnes from a surplus of around 900 tonnes in 2007. The physical gold market could see a surplus this year of 600 tonnes from 500 tonnes last year.

There is no such thing as a "surplus" of precious metal. This is an accounting term, used to designate demand by investors.
"Fundamentals come into play when prices are coming down," said John Reade, analyst at UBS. "Silver doesn't have gold's fundamentals."
Exactly. Silver does not have gold's fundamentals, silver's are much better. With industry consuming more silver than is mined each year, any slight increase in investor demand for silver will continue to drive silver's prices upwards, and make a mockery of all of wall street and all they do and all they have to offer. This is why they must band together, to write lying foolishness against silver as they do. This can only be an indication of them feeling pain in the silver market, not being able to coax out any supply from investors after having bombed the price in the last few weeks. The silver shortage is continuing with many coin shops still very low on silver supplies, as investor selling by the public, which was a large part of recycling supply, has changed since gold hit $1,000/oz., and now must be putting the squeeze on all of wall street, who are probably carrying a collective short position in silver.

ONE SOURCE OF DEMAND
Silver is often a byproduct of other metals such as lead, zinc and copper, where miners are trying to ramp up production with some success.
Funny theory. True, about 70% of silver production is as a by-product of the base metals. I just read that Chile, who produces 40% of the world's copper, is ramping down copper production due to a power crisis. And several more trusted analysts in our industry have finally turned bullish on copper recently.

That means more silver on the market and together with scrap recycling, supplies are set to jump this year, while overall demand, including that from ETFs is expected to fall.
Why would they project demand from silver ETFs to fall? That would be quite a change. It's rather hard to predict such changes; it's usually more likely that things will stay the same, with ever increased demand from the silver ETFs.

"Silver is very dependent on one source of demand -- ETFs.
That's not true. Silver prices will go up even without new investor demand, due to the overwhelming fundamentals that there is so little investment demand at all.
You can't get excited about silver in the same way as gold. Silver doesn't really have the same cachet," Briggs said.

Now that's true. Silver has absolutely no cachet. As I wrote above: 160% of gold mine supply is purchased by investors each year or about 4,000 tonnes of gold. In stark contrast, about .07% of silver mine supply is purchased by investors each year, about 1555 tonnes, or about 50 million ounces. So, how much money is spent on gold vs. silver each year?

Silver: 50 million oz. x $17/oz. = $850 million.
Gold: 4,000 tonnes x 32,151oz/tonne = 128.6 million oz. x $900/oz. = $115,743 million, or $115 billion.

Thus, 136 times as much money is spent on gold, than silver, by investors each year. Silver has absolutely no cachet, true, so true. And yet, the fundamentals are so much better, precisely due to that lower investor demand. When investors get educated about silver, they buy hand over fist, and create shortages at major coin shops around the world.

"Demand from the photographic sector has been falling fast ... It's no longer an important source of demand." For gold, the picture is somewhat different. Mine production is expected to hold steady this year, but analysts expect output in South Africa, a major producer, to fall over coming years because the ore that remains is deep and expensive to access.
Wow. What a totally biased statement, telling half truths that are totally irrelevant to silver vs. gold. These guys must either know nothing, or be intentionally trying to hammer silver prices. Silver's declining photography demand is being offset by rising industrial demand and the tiny increase in the tiny investor demand.

Fabrication demand -- jewelry and coins -- is expected to continue unabated as rising incomes in emerging market countries such as China and India allow people to choose gold over silver.
More hatchet jobs against silver are expected, while they continue to say that silver prices will be expected to fall, while silver prices actually rise. The reason that the establishment will not tell you to buy silver is because they don't have any. The investment demand is so tiny, they hardly have any silver at all, and have never been able to enter the market in any size. How can wall street establishments, who receive bail outs by the Fed, to the tune of $20 billion dollars at a time, buy any silver when the silver market is swamped by less than $1 billion of investor demand annually?

Be fruitful, multiply and you will see through the lies. Buy silver. They lie. - Jason Hommel www.silverstockreport.com

« Letter Re: Indian Tribal Reservation Boundaries as an Issue in Choosing Retreat Locales |Main| Note from JWR: »

Friday May 2 2008

Letter Re: Turning Your Trinkets Into Storage Food

Dear Mr. Rawles,
As I was divesting of the useless flotsam one sees as a hindrance to true preparedness, I was inspired to list my trinkets on eBay. (Now, for all those who have a hatred for eBay [because of their anti-gun policies] , this is a separate issue.) I also have a PayPal account. That is another stumbling block to some. But for those of us who are still making the transition to becoming prepared citizens (from their former place in the herd of sheeple), this may be a very viable opportunity. Please hear me out!

So, you sell your trash on EBay and get a [positive] PayPal “cash balance”. Fees notwithstanding, this “cash balance” spends like “cyber cash” with vendors who accept PayPal, if “cash” is such a thing in cyber space, but again, that is not my point here. It is a means to an end. Nothing more.

And we should all agree that there is no point in using credit to stock up. So my solution is turn trash into cash and then cash into stash!

Fir example Honeyville Grain accepts PayPal and sells brown rice, wheat, flour, and the food grade buckets and Oxygen absorbers to store it all--nearly anything you could want. And here is the kicker: they charge a flat fee of $ 4.95, regardless of the size of your order!

I know it is not as simple as a trip down to your local COSTCO, but we have seen how that works lately. The prices may not be dirt cheap, but for a person who is home bound, in a difficult geographical area (high rise dweller), or at a distance to supplies, you can sell useless white elephant trash on eBay, print postage right off your computer, the mailman comes and gets it, you earn a “cash balance” in your PayPal account, you order your food, and it comes to your door. "Easy peasy."

I do hope that the ambivalence some feel toward eBay and Paypal will not stand in the way of your sharing what may well be a very useful tool for someone who needs creative solutions for preparedness in this fast changing situation. Most kindly, and Semper Fidelis - Laura C. in Virginia
P.S.: My friend the former Marine calls me “Caroline Ingalls, Olivia Walton, and Sarah Conner all rolled into one!”

JWR Replies: Keep in mind that Honeyville's prices (pr pound) tend to be higher, since they "build in" the shipping costs to their prices. Also note that several SurvivalBlog advertisers accept payment via PayPal for non-gun related merchandise.

« Two Letters Re: Homestead Fuel Storage and Rotation |Main| Letter Re: Indian Tribal Reservation Boundaries as an Issue in Choosing Retreat Locales »

Letter Re: Sources for Inexpensive FAL Clone Rifles

Sir,
Do you know a place to get a cheap yet reliable FAL rifle? I am looking for one on a budget preferably under $400 or so. I would greatly appreciate help and i like your blog. Thanks, -- Derek

JWR Replies: Unfortunately, because the supply of parts sets has dried up, the price of US Code Section 922(r)-compliant FAL clones is starting to rise. The heyday of FAL clone building was a couple of years ago, when parts sets were cheap and plentiful. The prices then bottomed at about $500. Those days are gone!

Here is some background on pricing: US-made FAL receivers sell for $300 to $450. (That is just for a stripped receiver with sem-auto ejector block.) FAL Parts kits are starting to get scarce (because of the recent Federal ban on parts sets that include barrels), so those kits sell for $220 to $450, depending on maker and condition. (The days of $95 parts kits are long gone.) A set of 922(r) compliance US-made "HTS" (hammer, trigger, and sear) parts is $55. Assembly and headspacing by a gunsmith is $75+. And with refinishing included, assembly is more often $185+. The very lowest price that I have seen FAL clones sell for is about $600 (used, at a gun show), and $800+ is more typical. (Add at least $100 for an "inch pattern" (L1A1) variant.) Some of the nicer DSA-made FAL clones now sell for $2,400. For more details, see the FALFiles.com forums. There, in particular see the Marketplace Forum and their Gunsmithing & Build-It-Yourself Forum. For additional background information, also see my FAQ on FAL and L1A1 rifles.

With the decline of the dollar versus the Euro, I only expect FAL prices to rise. In the upcoming recession, you might stumble into a bargain, as cash-strapped owners sell guns in order to pay their bills. But don't count on that. Buy a FAL clone soon! I anticipate they will be at least $1,000 within a year.

« Odds 'n Sods: |Main| Two Letters Re: Food Shortages at COSTCO and Sam's Club Stores »

Sunday April 27 2008

The Value of Coupon Clipping in Stocking Up

Our family has always maintained a substantial pantry in addition to our "deep storage" items. One way we keep our pantry stocked is by taking advantage of grocery store sales and using coupons. This does take a bit of time on my part, but definitely pays off in the long run.

I utilize www.coupons.com, www.smartsource.com, www.couponbug.com (these sites allow you to print each coupon two times. We have two computers so that = 4 times each) as my mainstays. But recently I have become a reader of MoneySavingMom.com. She posts deals that I would have normally not found on my own.

One of my most recent "stock ups" have been on Muir Glen organic [canned] tomatoes. They offer $1 off coupons. You have to register. Once you register, click on the Muir Glen link. You are taken to a .pdf coupon for $1 off Muir Glen products along with $1 off Cascadian Farms products. There is no limit to the number of coupons you can print. I use these coupons to stock up on tomatoes and frozen vegetables. At my local Wal Mart the tomatoes cost 16 cents after the coupon and the vegetables cost 40 cents per one-pound bag after the coupon. I usually pick up a case or two on each shopping trip. If I used all 100+ coupons I have, I would probably be limited. I don't want to bring attention to myself.

These make great fillers along with our storage items. Hope this helps you and your readers. - MPS in Nevada

« Letter Re: Food Riots in Haiti |Main| Note from JWR: »

Wednesday April 16 2008

The Precepts of My Survivalist Philosophy

In the past week I've had three newcomers to SurvivalBlog.com write and ask me to summarize my world view. One of them asked: "I could spend days looking through [the] archives of your [many months of] blog posts. But there are hundreds of them. Can you tell me where you stand, in just a page? What distinguishes the "Rawlesian" philosophy from other [schools of] survivalist thought?"

I'll likely add a few items to this list as time goes on, but here is a general summary of my precepts:

Modern Society is Increasingly Complex, Interdependent, and Fragile. With each passing year, technology progresses and chains of interdependency lengthen. In the past 30 years, chains of retail supply have grown longer and longer. The food on your supermarket shelf does not come from local farmers. It often comes from hundreds or even thousands of miles away. This has created an alarming vulnerability to disruption. Simultaneously, global population is still increasing in a near geometrical progression. At some point that must end, most likely with a sudden and sharp drop in population. The lynchpin is the grid. Without functioning power grids, modern industrial societies will collapse within weeks.

Civilization is Just a Thin Veneer. In the absence of law an order, men quickly revert to savagery. As was illustrated by the rioting and looting that accompanied disasters in the past three decades, the transition from tranquility to absolute barbarism can occur overnight. People expect tomorrow to be just like today, and they act accordingly. But then comes a unpredictable disaster that catches the vast majority unprepared. The average American family has four days worth of food on hand. When that food is gone, we'll soon see the thin veneer stripped away.

People Run in Herds and Packs, but Both Follow Natural Lines of Drift. Most people are sheep ("sheeple"). A few are wolves that prey on others. But just a few of us are more like sheepdogs--we think independently, and instead of predation, we are geared toward protecting and helping others. People naturally follow natural lines of drift--the path of least resistance. When the Schumer hits the fan, 99% of urbanites will try to leave the cities on freeways. The highways and freeways will soon resemble parking lots. This means that you need to be prepared to both get out of town ahead of the rush and to use lightly-traveled back roads. Plan, study and practice.

Lightly Populated Areas are Safer than High Density Areas. With a few exceptions, less population means fewer problems. WTSHTF, there will be a mass exodus from the cities. Think of it as an army that is spreading out across a battlefield: The wider that they are spread, the less effective that they are. The inverse square law hasn't been repealed.

Show Restraint, But Always Have Recourse to Lethal Force. My father often told me, "It is better to have a gun and not need it, than need a gun, and not have it." I urge readers to use less than lethal means when safe and practicable, but at times there is not a satisfactory substitute for well-aimed lead going down range at high velocity.

There is Strength in Numbers. Rugged individualism is all well and good, but it takes ore than one man to defend a retreat. Effective retreat defense necessitates having at least two families to provide 24/7 perimeter security. But of course every individual added means having another mouth to feed. Absent having an unlimited budget and an infinite larder, this necessitates striking a balance when deciding the size of a retreat group.

There are Moral Absolutes. The foundational morality of the civilized world is best summarized in the Ten Commandments. Moral relativism and secular humanism are slippery slopes. The terminal moraine at the base of these slopes is a rubble pile consisting of either despotism and pillage, or anarchy and the depths of depravity. I believe that it takes both faith and friends to survive perilous times. For more background on that, see my Prayer page.

Racism Ignores Reason. People should be judged as individuals. Anyone that make blanket statements about other races is ignorant that there are both good and bad individuals in all groups. I have accepted The Great Commission with sincerity."Go forth into all nations" means exactly that: all nations. OBTW, I feel grateful that SurvivalBlog is now read in more than 100 countries. I have been given a bully pulpit, and I intend to use it for good and edifying purposes.

Skills Beat Gadgets and Practicality Beats Style. The modern world is full of pundits, poseurs, and Mall Ninjas. Preparedness is not just about accumulating a pile of stuff. You need practical skills, and those only come with study, training, and practice. Any armchair survivalist can buy a set of stylish camouflage fatigues and an M4gery Carbine encrusted with umpteen accessories. Style points should not be mistaken for genuine skills and practicality.

Plentiful Water and Good Soil are Crucial. Modern mechanized farming, electrically pumped irrigation, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides can make deserts bloom. But when the grid goes down, deserts and marginal farmland will revert to their natural states. In my estimation, the most viable places to survive in the midst of a long term societal collapse will be those with reliable summer rains and rich topsoil.

Tangibles Trump Conceptuals. Modern fiat currencies are generally accepted, but have essentially no backing. Because they are largely a byproduct of interest bearing debt, modern currencies are destined to inflation. In the long run, inflation dooms fiat currencies to collapse. The majority of your assets should be invested in productive farm land and other tangibles such as useful hand tools. Only after you have your key logistics squared away, anything extra should be invested in silver and gold.

Governments Tend to Expand their Power to the Point that They Do Harm. In SurvivalBlog, I often warn of the insidious tyranny of the Nanny State. If the state where you live becomes oppressive, then don't hesitate to relocate. Vote with your feet!

There is Value in Redundancy. A common saying of my readers is: "Two is one, and one is none." You must be prepared to provide for your family in a protracted period of societal disruption. That means storing up all of the essential "beans, bullets, and Band-Aids" in quantity. If commerce is disrupted by a disaster, at least in the short term you will only have your own logistics to fall back on. The more that you have stored, the more that you will have available for barter and charity.

A Deep Larder is Essential. Food storage is one of the key preparations that I recommend. Even if you have a fantastic self-sufficient garden and pasture ground, you must always have food storage that you can fall back on in the event that your crops fail due to drought, disease, or infestation.

Tools Without Training Are Almost Useless. Owning a gun doesn't make someone a "shooter" any more than owning a surfboard makes someone a surfer. With proper training and practice, you will be miles ahead of the average citizen. Get advanced medical training. Get the best firearms training that you can afford. Learn about amateur radio from your local affiliated ARRL club. Practice raising a vegetable garden each summer. Some skills are only perfected over a period of years.

Old Technologies are Appropriate Technologies. In the event of a societal collapse, 19th Century (or earlier) technologies such as a the blacksmith's forge, the treadle sewing machine, and the horse-drawn plow will be far easier to re-construct than modern technologies.

Charity is a Moral Imperative. As a Christian, I feel morally obligated to assist others that are less fortunate. Following the Old Testament laws of Tzedakah (charity and tithing), I believe that my responsibility begins with my immediate family and expands in successive rings to supporting my immediate neighborhood and church, to my community, and beyond, as resources allow. In short, my philosophy is to "give until it hurts" in times of disaster.

Buy Life Assurance, not Life Insurance. Self-sufficiency and self-reliance are many-faceted. You need to systematically provide for Water, Food, Shelter, Fuel, First Aid, Commo, and, if need be, the tools to enforce Rule 308.

Live at Your Retreat Year-Round. If your financial and family circumstances allow it, I strongly recommend that you relocate to a safe area and live there year-round. This has several advantages, most notably that will prevent burglary of your retreat logistics and allow you to regularly tend to gardens, orchards, and livestock. It will also remove the stress of timing a "Get Out of Dodge" trip at the11th hour. If circumstances dictate that you can't live at your retreat year round, then at least have a caretaker and stock the vast majority of your logistics in advance, since you may only have one trip there before roads are impassable.

Exploit Force Multipliers. Night vision gear, intrusion detection sensors, and radio communications equipment are key force multipliers. Because these use high technology they cannot be depended upon in a long term collapse, but in the short term, they can provide a big advantage. Some low technologies like barbed wire and defensive road cables also provide advantages and can last for several decades.

Invest Your Sweat Equity. Even if some of you have a millionaire's budget, you need to learn how to do things for yourself, and be willing to get your hands dirty. In a societal collapse, the division of labor will be reduced tremendously. Odds are that the only "skilled craftsmen" available to build a shed, mend a fence, shuck corn, repair an engine, or pitch manure will be you.and your family. A byproduct of sweat equity is muscle tone and proper body weight. Hiring someone to deliver three cords of firewood is a far cry from felling, cutting, hauling, splitting, and stacking it yourself.

Choose Your Friends Wisely. Associate yourself with skilled doers, not "talkers." Seek out people that share your outlook and morality. Living in close confines with other families is sure to cause friction but that will be minimized if you share a common religion and norms of behavior.You can't learn every skill yourself. Assemble a team that includes members with medical knowledge, tactical skills, electronics experience, and traditional practical skills.

There is No Substitute for Mass. Mass stops bullets. Mass stops gamma radiation. Mass stops (or at least slows down ) bad guys from entering a home and depriving its residents of life and property. Sandbags are cheap, so buy plenty of them. When planning your retreat house, think: medieval castle. (See the SurvivalBlog Archives for the many articles and letters on Retreat Architecture.)

Always Have a Plan B and a Plan C. Regardless of your pet scenario and your personal grand plan of survival, you need to be flexible and adaptable. Situations and circumstances change. Always keep a G.O.O.D. kit handy, even if you are fortunate enough to live at your retreat year-round.

Be Frugal. I grew up in a family that still remembered both our pioneer history and the more recent lessons of the Great Depression. One of our family mottos is: "Use it up, wear it out, make do, or do without."

Some Things are Worth Fighting For. I encourage my readers to avoid trouble, most importantly via relocation to safe areas where trouble is unlikely to come to visit. But there may come an unavoidable day that you have to make a stand to defend your own family or your neighbors. Further, if you value your liberty, then be prepared to fight for it, both for yourself and for the sake of your progeny.

« Letter Re: Using Dry Chlorine for Water Treatment |Main| Letter Re: Advice on Post-WTSHTF Weather Forecasting and Barometers »

Monday April 14 2008

Letter Re: Getting Physical with Silver Futures Contracts

Jim,
Congratulations on the continuing success of your blog site.

I think your readers would like some information regarding physical delivery of silver from futures contracts. I've never done this, or even known anyone who has, but it seems rational nowadays. One question I have is what type of mark or assay comes with, say, a 1,000 ounce delivery.

I also think many readers are interested in questions of how to plan "getting tangible" with their retirement accounts, by which I mean no paper. I know I have to think about this quite seriously. Felicitations, - Patrick (an American Ex-Pat in Asia)


JWR Replies: There are of course humorous apocryphal stories about a futures trader finding 100 "live lean hogs" left on his doorstep. But be advised that most futures and options markets are entirely "cash settled", so you can't take physical delivery even if you want to. Ask your broker if your particular market allows the alternative of physical delivery. Odds are that it doesn't.

As for "getting physical" with retirement accounts, if you don't want to take the tax and withdrawal penalty of cashing out, I strongly recommend rolling over IRA and 401(k) accounts into Gold American Eagle vault storage IRA accounts available through Swiss America Trading Corp. I have had one of these accounts since the early 1990s, starting when I first worked in the corporate world. At the time, my co-workers thought that I was crazy. But I had the last laugh, in the long run. In the Spring of 2000, when I worked as a technical writer for Oracle Corporation, I was buying one ounce Gold Eagles for my Gold IRA at around $290 per ounce. Meanwhile, many of my co-workers were enthusiastically buying Oracle stock at around $40 per share (split adjusted) through the employee stock purchase plan (ESPP). Oracle now sells for around $19.50 per share. But their loss is even worse when you consider inflation.

« Letter Re: Retreat Livestock Guardians |Main| Notes from JWR: »

Tuesday April 8 2008

Letter Re: Horse Breeding Now, and in the Future

Jim,
I wanted your opinion on something. I raise Quarter horses, mostly show prospects and have done this for a lifetime. I own the stallion, I do the breeding of my own mares and ship [straws of frozen] semen all over the country for others. I also train outside horses for a living. As you well know the horse economy like everything else is going down the tubes. I have been down sizing for the past three years as the Holy Spirit has prompted [my string] going [down] from 60 to 30. I did not breed any of my mares back this year and my focus is continuing to downsize. I know the job these horses were bred for is no longer going to be available. They will be needing a new job. My question to you is, do you think there would be a market through SurvivalBlog for any of my stock? I breed for good minds, great bones and of course movement (which I understand would not matter to a survivalist) disposition and beauty. These are hearty horses, I believe they could make great work horses, pack horses or just about anything you asked them to be. I think the catch for the horses I would have available would be the fact that some are untrained 2 and 3 year olds. I'm madly working on breaking this last big group, but I can only ride so many a day.
It is just a passing idea. This is my web site if you want to take a peek at what I have. Thanks for your time and honesty. God Bless, - Merry

JWR Replies: In the short term, it might be a good idea to reduce your breeding stock, but in the long term, your brood mares may make you wealthy. I'm sure that some SurvivalBlog readers will be contacting you, particularly looking for mares.

One of the biggest concerns for horse owners, at present, is the high price of feed. The global grain shortage has pushed up feed prices tremendously. Because grain prices will remain high, I expect hay prices to stay high, in sympathy. (Markets are all about supply and demand.) It didn't help that last spring and summer were dry in the western US, and most hay growers only got one marketable cutting. This pushed hay prices up to insane prices. This prompted many cattlemen and horse breeders to thin their herds.

In the long term, however, high fuel prices and spot shortages will likely cause a resurgent interest in working horses. This is most likely in regions with lush pasture and plentiful hay. In the arid west, where hay is a product of circular irrigation, working horses probably won't make quite so strong a comeback.

In a post-Peak Oil collapse, horse breeding stock--for both draft horses and saddle horses--would be like gold.

My advice: If you don't have extensive pastures and own your own hay ground and hence buy a lot of hay each year, then thin your string of brood mares down to just your very best couple of dozen, for the next few years. However, maintain your ranch infrastructure, so that you can "ramp up" to larger production, if need be. Do not sell off any pasture ground, hay ground, stock panels, or haying equipment! Also, hang on to every saddle and piece of tack that you own. In fact, if you have the chance to buy more tack (as the horse market continues to crash), and you have a secure storage space that will keep it safe from mold and mice, then invest in more tack. Doing so will take advantage of the fire sale prices on tack that we will no doubt see for the next few years. To amplify on our previous exchange of e-mail: You can breed horses, but you can't breed tack. In a few years, all those new horse buyers will be screaming for saddles and tack! Buy low and sell high.

One ironic situation we may see in the next decade: All over rural America, there are antique horse-drawn hay mowers that are now rusting away as yard ornaments. I predict that many of them will be oiled up and pressed into service. Hopefully, they won't be too far gone.

« Letter Re: Advanced Medical Care and Transport After TEOTWAWKI |Main| Camping Trips as Training for WTSHTF, by DPM »

Saturday April 5 2008

Letter Re: Silver Coins Holding Their Own Against Inflation

Sir;
First, this interesting bit from an article from the Chicago Tribune: Food Price Inflation Changes How We Shop.
Here are some quotes from the article: "Steadily rising food costs aren't just causing grocery shoppers to do a double-take at the checkout line -- they're also changing the very ways we feed our families.
The worst case of food inflation in nearly 20 years has more Americans giving up restaurant meals to eat at home. We're buying fewer luxury food items, eating more leftovers and buying more store brands instead of name-brand items..."
"Record-high energy, corn and wheat prices in the past year have led to sticker shock in the grocery aisles. At $1.32, the average price of a loaf of bread has increased 32 percent since January 2005. In the last year alone, the average price of carton of eggs has increased almost 50 percent."
.
Now a quick trip to Coinflation.com where we see that at the current price of silver ($17.38 per ounce, as of today) a pre-1965 [mint date] 90% silver dime has a melt value of $1.26.
So it looks like silver is holding it's own against inflation. The price of a loaf of bread is still close to 10¢, if you're using "real" money, that is...

I hope this is of interest, Jim. By the way, I received your novel "Patriots: Surviving the Coming Collapse" for my birthday last month. It was great. Thanks, - Jonas

« Weekly Survival Real Estate Market Update |Main| Note from JWR: »

Friday April 4 2008

Economic Climate Change: The Long Winter May Begin This Summer

I've had several consulting clients contact me in recent weeks, all with notes of fear in their voices. They realize that something is horribly wrong with the economy, but they cannot properly isolate and articulate the problem. I haven't been able to calm them, however, because to an extent I share their anxiety. In my estimation, the "something wrong" that we sense is nothing short of a monumental shift in the economic climate.

America is clearly headed for a recession. Most economic recessions are simply a product of the business cycle. These recessions are relatively mild and they often last just 12 to 24 months. The economic engine just readjusts and everything soon gets back to normal. But this nascent recession in 2008 is something radically different, and it won't be short-lived. The current slow down was triggered by a collapse in the global credit market. For decades, the global credit market grew and grew, in an enormous debt spiral. Our neighbors to the south saw trouble coming decades ago, because their economies were at the time more debt-dependent than our own. As far back as the mid-1980s, their newspapers featured political cartoons that portrayed an enormous, insatiable monster that was invariably captioned "La Dueda"--"The Debt". Our cousins in Latin America saw it coming first, but the dark side of the debt nemesis will soon be clear to everyone.

Because modern banking in the western world is based on interest charges that create continuously compounding debt, credit cannot continue to grow indefinitely. At some point the excesses of malinvestment become so great that the entire system collapses. This is what we are now witnessing: a banking panic that is spreading uncontrollably as wave after wave of ugly debt gets destroyed by margin calls and subsequent business failures.

Some economists are fixated on reading charted histories--and unrealistically expect that by doing so that the can reliably predict future market moves. (They can't do that any more than I could predict the bends in the road ahead by keeping a chart of the preceding left and right turns of my car's steering wheel. My apologies for any offense to my friend The Chartist Gnome, but you are fooling yourself.) Although they are working from a flawed premise at the micro level, the chartists do have some things right on the macro level: There are major economic "seasons" and even climate changes. The most vocal chartists like Robert Prechter hold to what is called the Elliot Wave Theory. And the big bad nasty in this school of thought is a Kondratieff Winter. This "K-Winter" is an economic depression phase that the world has not fully experienced since the 1930s. An economic winter does not end until after the foundations of industry and consumer demand are rebuilt. This can be a painful process, often culminating with war on a grand scale. (It was no coincidence that the Second World of the early 1940s was an outgrowth of the Great Depression of the 1930s.)

The US Federal Reserve and the other central banks are furiously pumping liquidity to the best of their ability, but in the long run they will not be successful. At best, dumping billions in cash on the economy will delay a depression by perhaps a year or two. But inevitably, a K-Winter depression will come. And the longer that it is delayed, then the worse the depression will be. Further inflating the debt bubble will only make matters worse. I think that veteran market analyst Jim Rogers had it right, in a recent interview. Take a few minutes to watch that video. Jim Rogers sees the big picture. I wouldn't be surprised to hear that he has gone off somewhere to hunker in a bunker.

"Big Picture" Implications

As I've mentioned before, hedge funds are presently most at risk in the unfolding liquidity crisis, because they use lots of leverage in lending funds that they themselves have borrowed. They borrow short and lend lon, effectively use debt compounded upon debt. Many, many hedge funds will be bankrupted before the end of 2008.

Even more alarming is the scale of global derivatives trading, particularly for credit default swaps (CDS). Derivatives are a relatively new phenomenon, so derivatives contract holders have not yet experienced a major recession or a depression. Thus, it is difficult to predict what will happen in a genuine K-Winter phase. In a perfect world, derivatives are a nicely balanced mechanism, where there are parties and counterparties, and every derivatives contract equation balances out to have a neat "zero" at its conclusion. But we don't live in a perfect world: Companies go bankrupt. Contracts get breached. Counterparties disappear and disappoint. We have not ever experienced a derivatives full scale "blow up", but I predict that when it happens, it will be spectacular.

The scale of derivatives trading is monumental, and the vast majority of the population is blissfully ignorant of both its scale and the implications of a derivatives crisis. There are presently about $500 trillion of derivatives contracts in play. That is many times the size of the gross product of the global economy, but the average man on he street has no idea what is going on. It won't be until after the giant derivatives casino implodes that the Generally Dumb Public (GDP) awakens and asks, "What the heck happened?" Since the credit market began to collapse last summer, the number of new derivatives contracts has dropped precipitously. But whether the aggregate derivative market is $400 trillion versus $500 trillion, when a crisis occurs there will undoubtedly be some very deep drama.

The next decade will likely be characterized by successive waves of inflation and deflation, and perhaps some of both simultaneously, at different levels. Countless corporations, and perhaps a few currencies or even whole governments will go under as this tumult plays out. The current low interest rates will soon be replaced by double-digit rates, much like we saw in the late1970s. The dollar will lose value in foreign exchange, and may collapse completely. The Mother of All Bailouts (MOAB) will result in mass inflation. The bull markets in silver and gold will surge ahead, propelled by economic and currency instability. (Investors will be desperate to find a safe haven, when currencies and equities are falling apart.)

Risk Mitigation

Be ready to "winter over" the coming K Winter depression. That will require: 1.) Prayer. 2.) Friends that you can count on (a "retreat group"). 3.) A deep larder, and 4.) An effective means of self defense with proper training. (For each of those four factors, see the hundreds of archived articles and letters at SurvivalBlog.com for details.)

Since large-scale layoffs seem likely, it would also be wise to have a second income from a recession-proof home-based business.

In the event of a "worst case" (grid down) economic collapse, it would be prudent to have a self-sufficient retreat in a rural area that is well-removed from major population centers. Get the majority of your funds out of anything that is dollar-denominated, and into tangibles, as soon as possible. The very best tangible that you can buy is a stout house on a piece of productive farm land. It will not only preserve your wealth, but living there may very well save your life.

« Front Sight's New "Get a Gun" Training and Gear Offer |Main| Note from JWR: »

Thursday April 3 2008

The Hedges Get Trimmed

Just as I warned the readers of SurvivalBlog many months ago, hedge funds are vulnerable to rapid swings in interest rates. (My first warning was even before the pair of Bear Stearns hedge funds collapsed in the summer of 2007.) As the global liquidity crisis has expanded, other hedge funds have started to collapse en masse.

Here is an article is from England that is indicative of what is happening globally. (This is a global collapse, because again, as I warned, the current liquidity crisis is global in scale.) Hedge fund legends hit by financial crisis.

And here is an article from the American perspective: Debt Reckoning: U.S. Receives a Margin Call

With leverage ratios that average 26-to-1, hedge funds are very vulnerable to margin calls.

Check out this video clip on the hit to the finance houses, and this one on the plight of the hedge funds.

The Insider told me he expects that the majority of publicly-traded US hedge funds may be out of business by the end of 2008. Seventy down, 6,850 to go.

« Lessons From Fiction--A Critique of "I Am Legend", by Michael Z. Williamson |Main| Note from JWR: »

Monday March 31 2008

News from Wall Street and Capitol Hill--The Mother Of All Bailouts Begins to Grow

Last week, the mainstream media described the latest expansion of the Mother of All Bailouts (MOAB), but they politely refrained from calling this what it is: socialism, plain and simple. The grand plan, as it stands now, is to bail out not just consumer banks, but also investment banks, with taxpayer dollars. They are effectively making our life savings and our future earnings surety for a bunch of idiotic contrapreneurs' loans on everything from flat top duplexes to McMansions. These were houses that the contrapreneurs bought, that they could never really afford unless the market continued to rise at an artificial rate. They bought these houses with the intention of "flipping" them, but then the market topped out, and the "easy money" party ended.

At least those hated fascist dictators like Mussolini had the common sense to nationalize viable, productive companies. But now Ben Bernanke is busy nationalizing a slew of corporations with negative net worth. This is absolute lunacy!

Here are four examples of the mainstream's view:

From The Washington Post: Fed Leaders Ponder an Expanded Mission.

From The New York Times: Treasury Dept. Seeks New U.S. Power to Keep Markets Stable

From Reuters: Treasury regulatory overhaul plan "timely": Fed

And finally (with an ever-so-slightly more conservative view), this from Fox News: Bush Administration Proposes Sweeping Overhaul of Financial Regulation.

All of these calls for regulation, new government agencies, and greater scrutiny might outwardly sound well-reasoned, but they ignore some inescapable underlying problems: We have a fiat currency that is based on debt, we have a banking system with fictional fractional reserves, we have a derivatives market that is a $500 trillion casino, and we have a national treasury that is backed by wishful thinking--certainly not by anything tangible.

The other key point that seems to have escaped the mainstream media is that this new regulatory power is being handed to the Federal Reserve, which is a private banking cartel, not a government agency. They are no more "Federal" than the Federal Express parcel courier company. So this isn't just socialism. This is nothing short of corporate-controlled socialism--where a handful of banking corporations are given access to the Federal tax coffers to bail out other institutions and then, even further, they are given sweeping regulatory powers. This power grab is deemed "necessary" by circumstances that the Federal Reserve itself created! Somewhere, somehow, somebody stands to make a lot of money in this process. Cui bono? I'll wager that it won't be the American taxpayers that benefit. As economist Mish Shedlock observes, this is like putting the Fox in Charge of the Henhouse. Mish summed up the current mess succinctly: "The biggest, most reckless credit experiment in history has started to implode. It's far too late to stop a complete systemic collapse now. Granting new powers to the agency most responsible for the mess simply does not make any sense."

Secrecy is another concern. In a recent e-mail, SurvivalBlog reader KAF commented: "We should be greatly concerned about the fact that the Federal Reserve has provided public release anonymity to the institutions who are taking '30 day' never ending loans. We'll now never know if the institutions we deal with are truly solvent and credible, This new"confidentiality" allows the Fed. to manipulate reserves on a routine basis. We'll never know if this country's Federal Reserve is or is not heading for bankruptcy unless we use the tests of consumer spending and commodity pricing as indicators." She hit the nail on the head. At the same time that the press is howling for "greater transparency" in banking, and writing exposes of "predatory lending practices", the Powers That Be are drawing the veil of secrecy over lending institutions. They'd rather treat us like mushrooms--keeping us in the dark and feeding us barn waste--than risk a panic by letting the public know the real depth of the liquidity crisis and its collateral effects.

Instead of government platitudes, do you want some figures to chew on? Look at this Federal Reserve web page. The negative numbers at the bottom of the "Non-loaned Reserves" column speak volumes. Without the newly-created Federal Reserve "emergency lending mechanisms", many banks would be absolutely bankrupt. As you can see, the bankers are swimming in red ink. There is now a huge risk of bank runs, but this threat is being ignored by the mainstream media. Mark my words: There are bank runs coming.

The fact is that the global lending system is essentially broken. Artificially lowering interest rates won't fix it, when bankers are afraid to lend. As I've previously noted, the bankers are afraid to lend because so much re-packaging and reshuffling of debt has gone on in the past seven years that nobody knows who owes what to whom, and precisely what assets are underlying these exotic debt "packages." Meanwhile, the bankers have learned that the big insurance firms like Fitch, Moody's and S&P were in on the swindle. We now know that they colluded with their mortgage firm buddies to inflate assets and deflate risks in a masterpiece of legerdemain that would make Enron's accountants proud.

The bottom line is the the entire world economy is is in deep, deep trouble. Without financing, the Big Machine is grinding to a halt. The next few years will probably see the economy plunge into a deep recession, if not a full blown depression. The current headlines are just a foreshadowing of the real crisis to come. The MOAB will grow and grow, eventually bailing out far more than just banks. There will be brokerage houses, insurance firms, S&Ls, credit unions, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac, and possibly even muni bonds and pension funds are all lined up, ready to reach into our wallets. Once the government starts down the slippery slope of bailout-socialism schemes, they will perforce spread to more and more institutions. And, as I've previously noted, the public coffers will be insufficient to cover the inestimable costs of the MOAB. So this mean that Uncle Sam will monetize the difference. They'll just create the needed "dollars" out of thin air. This will be outrageously inflationary, at all levels.

All of this is not going unnoticed by European and Asian bankers. They can see that the dollar is set for mass inflation, so they are dumping dollars as fast as they can. It is no wonder that the US Dollar Index has plummeted. When I last checked, it took $1.58 to buy one Euro! The foreign bankers aren't stupid. Upcoming auctions of US Treasury paper will languish with very few takers. I predict that in less than a year, the Treasury yields will have to be pumped up substantially to attract enough bidders to get the needed financing to cover the budget deficit. We could see double digit rates--a la the late 1970s--in the not too distant future.

All of these macro-level implications might seem fairly abstract, so let me put them in real world terms and take the risk of extrapolating on some trends that I've observed: There will be a recession, and it will be deep, and long-lasting. A recession will mean that there will be some big corporate layoffs. Be ready. There will be bank runs and banking "holidays". Be ready. There will be huge flows of "bailout" funds that will effectively nationalize many industries. Be ready. There will probably be a stock market collapse. Be ready. There will be a further collapse in residential real estate that will make the recent declines seem small, by comparison. Be ready. Credit delinquencies and foreclosures (on car loans, home loans, credit card bills, etc.) will dramatically increase. Be ready. There will be a collapse of the commercial real estate market. Be ready. Even though the credit available for IPOs and private mergers and acquisitions has dried up, there will be news of some large and seemingly inexplicable acquisitions in the near future, all sanctioned by and in some cases, underwritten by, and even funded by, the Federal government. Be ready. There will be shortages of key commodities including fuel and food. Be ready. Strapped for cash, America's highway, rail, water, sewer, telecommunications, and power infrastructures will degenerate. Be ready. There will be mass inflation of the US Dollar that will devalue any dollar denominated investments. Be ready.

And now, to further extrapolate, (with a lower level of confidence): All of the aforementioned economic dislocation and surging inflation might trigger mass protests, riots, looting, and arson in the cities. Be ready. There may then be massive out-migration from the cities. Be ready. Wars have been known to follow close on the heels of depressions and financial crises, so there may be a war, possibly big enough to require another draft. Be ready.

As I've written many times before, the real lynchpin to worry about is the power grid. If the grid goes down, then all bets are off. Be vigilant, be well-stocked with a deep larder, and be self-sufficient. Store extra for charity. If you can afford to, establish a survival retreat in a lightly-populated region, and if possible, live there year-round.

« Odds 'n Sods: |Main| Note from JWR: »

Sunday March 30 2008

The Nationalization of Wall Street, by John Ing


Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke once said: “By increasing the number of U.S. dollars in circulation, or even by credibly threatening to do so, the U.S. government can also reduce the value of a dollar in terms of goods and services, which is equivalent to raising the prices in dollars of those goods and services. We conclude that, under a paper money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending and hence positive inflation.”

The Fed slashed short-term interest rates six times in six months to 2.25 per cent from 5.25 per cent despite the U.S. Department of Labor reporting that consumer prices had jumped 4.3 per cent at an annual rate in January -- the biggest rise in two years. As a result, the Fed's benchmark overnight lending rate is about half the rate of inflation and real interest rates are now negative. The last time interest rates were negative, housing exploded; the housing bubble grew larger stoked by Wall Street's alchemy of mortgage backed securities that are at the heart of the unfolding crisis.
Bernanke, a student of the Great Depression, believes that policymakers and politicians then were too slow in countering the downturn, letting the resulting panic sink the economy. Bernanke is right about the foot-dragging almost eight decades ago. But by slashing interest rates and lending hundreds of billions to Wall Street today, he risks creating yet another bubble. Already, Bernanke has orchestrated the biggest bailout since the Great Depression in the wake of the collapse of the mortgage industry. Even oil, gold and other commodities retreated rapidly from record highs as traders flattened positions in a desperate deleveraging process. The greatest fear is the fear of the unknown. The current financial crisis is due to the lack of confidence and trust because of uncertainty about the extent and breadth of the potential financial losses.

Counterparty Defaults

The credit market simply lacks credit. The subprime woes have spilled over into dislocations in the overall credit markets – from municipal debt, to corporate debt, to derivatives. Fears of a default by a counterparty is threatening the global financial system and is believed to be one of the reasons behind JP Morgan Chase’s bid for Bear Stearns. Banks are hoarding and have stopped lending since their thin capital base (and solvency) is at risk while their customers such as hedge funds, private equity and Corporate America are forced to deleverage and dump the assets – like those owned by Bear Stearns – in a no bid market. Lower rates will not unblock this logjam. Unfortunately, lower interest rates are not the answer in warding off this financial market crisis. The source of America’s problems is not interest rates. The problem is simply too much debt and too much leverage. A great unwinding is the answer.

Despite the dramatic drop in rates, there are still no signs of a pick-up in the credit markets. Trust has evaporated. Banks are desperately trying to dump billions of leveraged securities in an illiquid market. To date Wall Street has taken only $200 billion of writedowns but has only raised about $100 billion, leaving a shortfall. The Fed has extended loans to the investment banks, taking on some of their illiquid paper as collateral. After failing to offload these to a naive public, the game of "slicing and dicing" risk and dispersing this risk is over. Now, that risk has come back to haunt them. And any sale becomes a new benchmark for these dubious assets, leading to more price cuts and, of course, further fire sales and bigger losses. The markets have yet to reprice risk.

The Tip of the Iceberg
In the credit binge, the risk-rating agencies became more like principals rather than advisors and helped spread the poor quality of debt by rating risk highly. Today, AAA ratings mean nothing. With the closing of America's capital market, the big Wall Street icons such as Citicorp, Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley were forced to rebuild their balance sheets with the help of foreign buyers such as foreign sovereign wealth funds from Singapore to Kuwait. America's growing reliance on foreigners for funding its deficits has become its Achilles heel. Already there is a controversy over the growth of sovereign wealth funds (SWF), which manage between $2.5 trillion and $3 trillion, and to date more than $100 billion has bailed out Wall Street's biggest investment banks. But the United States can't accept this money without conditions. In the past, the Asian or Middle Eastern buyers bought trophy buildings, recycling their excess dollars back into the United States. As of last summer, foreigners owned $ 6 trillion or 66 per cent of the entire $9 trillion U.S. federal debt load.
In order to keep their currencies competitive, the Asian central banks and the petro powers of the Middle East ploughed their reserves into U.S. treasuries. This is great while it lasts, but as Asia booms and Wall Street declines, the big buyers of treasuries are growing disenchanted with some of their earlier purchases. No one likes to lose money and the Fed must somehow maintain the trust of foreigners. China's near-Bear experience and the promise of more taxpayer-assisted bailouts will certainly cause foreigners to think twice about investing in the United States. Wall Street's problems seem to be chronic and the Chinese are looking at huge losses in their foray into Wall Street. It will get worse. We believe there will be less Asian money available to finance America’s trade deficits, which requires over $2 billion a day of outside funds.

Wall Street's Margin Call
The party is over on Wall Street. Carlyle Capital Corp., the publicly traded investment fund affiliated with the powerful Carlyle Group, defaulted on $22 billion of mortgage securities on a flimsy capital base of less than $1 billion. That is 22 times leverage, exceeding the leverage of bankrupt Long Term Capital Management LLC. And venerable Bear Stearns was sold for about one third per cent of its value the previous week. With almost $100 billion of liabilities against book value of less than $12 billion, the investment bank was forced to close its doors at liquidation value. Bear Stearns was the key prime financer/broker for America's biggest hedge funds and its demise threatens a domino-like counterparty chain reaction that could spread throughout Wall Street.

Bear’s key role in the web of financial players and counterparty risk emerged as a major reason for the Fed’s bailout. Ironically, it was last summer’s collapse of two Bear hedge funds that sparked the upheaval in the markets. Bear simply was hoist upon its own petard. Most troubling is that all investment banks are similarly highly leveraged. Bear Stearns borrowed $30 for every $1 of capital. Yet Morgan Stanley has leverage of 32 to 1, Merrill Lynch 28:1, Lehman Bros. 32:1 and Goldman Sachs 26:1. Worse still, not even the Sheriff of Wall Street is around to witness the unraveling.
That Wall Street cannot fund itself has forced its major players to borrow massive amounts of money from the Federal Reserve. The Fed has even taken to accepting dubious assets as collateral to alleviate the financial stress in the markets, which in essence makes the Fed "the garbage collector of last resort." The Fed created a growing $200 billion lifeline available to lend treasuries in exchange for unmarketable triple-A mortgage-backed securities. Bear Stearns was the first recipient of this largesse and already the Fed is on the hook for more than $30 billion of Bear's obligations that JP Morgan does not want. This is not a crisis in liquidity but one of solvency.

In our view, the Fed’s solution is simply the beginning of the de facto nationalization of Wall Street. What’s particularly worrisome is that the Fed has started on the slippery slope of taking on the credit risk and liabilities of Wall Street, similar to the Bank of England’s bailout of Northern Rock, which ended in the nationalization of that sorry institution. The Bank of England’s nationalization of Britain’s largest mortgage company cost taxpayers more than $200 billion. The sobering message, however, is that it’s far from over. Inevitably, politicians and regulators are pressured to prevent more problems, but there is no point in closing the barn door after the horse has left.

With the shadow of the Thirties looming, the Fed's orchestration of events since August, from the decision to give Wall Street access to the discount window, to the acceptance of Wall Street's inventory as collateral, to the cronyism of the Plunge Protection Team (PPT) to the $30 billion backstop of unwanted securities to the Bear Stearns' rescue, to the relaxation of rules governing quasi-government bodies such as money losing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, all points to a role beyond that of a lender of last resort. In absorbing the liabilities of Wall Street, the Fed is simply piling on debt on more debt. No nation, even the United States, can borrow forever without facing up to economic consequences. And no one is too big to fail.

Just Who Will Bail Out The Fed?
The U.S. dollar is among the sickest currencies in the world, giving up 50 per cent of its value since 2002 because the United States is deep in the financial hole. The gap between spending and revenue grows ever wider. Today, foreigners are not so eager to help. The problem is that America is a debtor country and dependent on foreigners to finance its chronic deficits requiring an inflow of $800 billion from foreign investors each year to finance the country's deficits. Not surprisingly, America's creditors are losing confidence in the country's solvency. Americans spend too much and save too little. America's trade deficit is at seven percent of GDP and the budgetary deficit - excluding supplement spending for the war - is estimated at $400 billion. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan so far at $600 billion and Congress is to approve another $275 billion. The CBO estimates the war might eventually cost between $1 trillion and $2 trillion by 2017. Meantime, consumer spending accounts for more than 70 per cent of the U.S. economy, but household debt is now at 140 per cent of consumers of after-tax income. Debt on debt is not good.
There is no question that the bursting of the housing bubble and the cost of the inevitable breakdown of the financial system has created huge dangers for the global financial system. The vortex already has dragged down institutions in the United Kingdom, Switzerland and New York. The United States is on a path similar to Japan’s deflation in 1990s. While the savings and loan bailout cost U.S. taxpayers “only” $200 billion, this time the potential cost of the biggest bailout in history is estimated at more than $1.2 trillion or enough to wipe out half of the global banking sector’s capital. We believe that fears that U.S. taxpayers face even bigger bailouts to save Wall Street will further undermine confidence in the dollar, boosting gold’s allure. Gold is a good thing to have as a barometer of investor anxiety.
Previous crises such as the stock market meltdown in October 1987, the S&L crisis in the early the 90s and the Asian contagion in 1997 or the bursting of the tech bubble in 2000 had a common denominator – too much money chasing too few markets. Warren Buffett warned that derivatives today are the new ticking time bomb. Derivatives exploded to a whopping $516 trillion by 2007, according to the Bank of International Settlements. Yet it is not the size of the market that concerns us. It is the growing risk of counterparty failure since the capital position of the global banking system supporting the $500 trillion plus of derivatives is estimated at only $2 trillion, insufficient to handle even one per cent of potential losses.

Stagflation Now?
In January, U.S. farm prices had an annualized 7.4 percent increase, the biggest yearly gain in more than 26 years. Beset by credit woes, the U.S. economy appears to be entering a period of low growth and high inflation, just like the stagflation of the 1970s. Rising food and energy prices are sopping up what is left of consumers' discretionary income. The bad news is that central banks appear to be providing the very fuel that will stoke inflation even further. The Fed's dramatic lowering of interest rates has not helped domestic demand. Instead, it has simply sped up the flood of capital away from the United States. There is tight productive capacity from potash to steel to coal while the only surplus seems to be in cars and condos. Of concern is that the rise in commodity prices is not cyclical but structural, with huge supply shortages.

Inflation is the monetary flavour of the week and the month. Inflation is rising, pushed upwards by high oil, food and commodity prices. Short-term government yields are at lows only because of the Fed's panic to prop up Wall Street and long rates are actually rising. More important, inflation is on the rise in France, Japan and Saudi Arabia. Meantime, in China it is at the highest level in a decade.
The Fed is worried more about the risk of a financial meltdown than rising inflation. This time, central banks have not only flooded the system with money but also loosened financial regulations for highly leveraged mortgage giants Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Prices, of course, are rising because there is too much money being created. The root cause of inflation is money creation. Sadly, for the central banks and the financial markets, inflation is the obvious solution to U.S. indebtedness, allowing money to depreciate even faster. For creditors, this is not a solution.

The potent combination of a slowdown, the cost of Wall Street's bailouts and skyrocketing commodities has investors justifiably worried about a repeat of 1970s stagflation. In the 1970s, two oil embargos doubled the price of oil to $50 a barrel. The oil shocks were accompanied by a surge in 'soft' commodities after the anchovy fishery off the coast of Peru almost disappeared. The need to replace the anchovies caused the Japanese to switch to soybeans, which caused a spike in prices. Indeed, the jump in commodities crippled the global economy. Costs went up and wages were raised to compensate for increased prices in a classic case of cost-push inflation. In 1980, the U.S. inflation rate reached 13 per cent and wage and price controls were imposed when inflation hit 4 percent, the identical level today. Gold rose from $35 an ounce to more than $850. Interest rates soared to double digits when the government realized that it had to fight inflation, Fed Chairman Paul Volcker arrived on the scene, eventually snuffing out inflation by sending interest rates to the sky, which ended in a decade of stagflation.

Today, we have similar ingredients in place, now only monetary policy is much easier. The parallels are most ominous. Recently, M2 money supply increased a whopping $35 billion a week as the Fed provided both expansive monetary and fiscal stimulus. With inflation picking up, investors should know that the current monetary inflation is not just an increase in the monetary base. It is the leverage impact of this monetary inflation, which creates bubbles. As in the 1970s, food prices have now risen by more than 75 percent from the lows of 2000. Meantime, China's growth and poor weather has intensified demand, cutting into supplies at the same time. Ironically, the spike in the oil price has encouraged the conversion of grain to bio-fuels, helping to trigger a dramatic increase in food prices. This is controversial because Americans are actually subsidizing crops for fuel instead of for food; making it seem more important to drive an SUV in the United States than it is to eat.
Moreover, the news could be even worse than we think because the government's inflation statistics are skewed. For example, the 'core" inflation rate excludes energy and food prices because of a desire to 'even out' spikes. Thus, we are told inflation rose only 2.7 per cent on an annualized basis in February. The elimination of food and energy has relegated inflation to the back pages, making historic rate comparisons meaningless. The bottom line, however, is that energy and food prices are increasing and the core rate is on the move. The CPI rate is actually 4.3 per cent, the same level that spurred wage and price controls on Aug. 15, 1971.

When The Swamp Drains, The Ugly Frogs Are Exposed
For us, there is a sense of déjà vu because the Bernanke reflation is similar to Alan Greenspan keeping interest rates too low for too long causing the housing bubble and, ultimately, the credit bubble. Now both have burst and we have Bernanke pumping yet again. To avoid a systemic banking crisis, the Fed has opened the monetary flood gates. Investors are concerned about credit conditions. If Wall Street firms continue to lose money at current rates, they will find themselves below capital requirements in less than six months. Bernanke and Wall Street appear to think that the solution is to reduce interest rates. And yet by relaxing borrowing requirements, they are in fact leveraging the system even more.

America's solution is to devalue its currency further and monetize this mountain of debt by inflating its way out of the problems, just as it did in the 1970s. And the emphasis on more bailouts has prompted investors to seek refuge in 'hard assets' such as gold and oil as a hedge against future inflation and currency depreciation. That is why gold hit $1,000 an ounce.

The U.S. dollar has fallen to a new low against the euro while gold recorded new highs. Further rate cuts by the Fed have the effect 'pushing on a string' and to date has not ended the downward spiral in housing. The Fed has cut rates by 300 basis points but long-term yields have actually gone up, not down, further reflecting investors' concern that inflation is the next big problem. Mortgage rates have actually gone up. After the subprime mess came the CDO mess. Then the investment banks fell and now the hedge funds are falling. All are subject to capital constraints, and in the deleveraging process, Wall Street's inadequacies are surfacing just as a draining swamp exposes its ugliest frogs.

The Bottom Line?
We believe the piling on of more debt to rescue the financial system and the U.S. economy is unlikely to work in the face of a surge in inflation. Nor will driving interest rates to the floor work since it will debase the dollar further. Americans have become too dependent on foreigners, who have become increasingly uncomfortable with their enormous dollar holdings.
Reflation has created a new commodity bubble. The other driver is the emergence of China and India, coupled with supply constraints caused by sustained underinvestment. The aging infrastructure of the commodities producers has not kept pace with the new demand. Thus, there is a need for the market to return to balance. Unfortunately, greater money supply will neither cause a fall in demand nor significant increases in supply, so prices are expected to remain at elevated levels for some time to come. In mining, for example, it will take at least five years before any new discoveries come on stream. In addition, power shortages in South Africa have led the mining industry to both curtail expansion and current production. Consequently, there will continue to be waves of consolidation as the bigger mining companies look to economies of scale. Gold is a good commodity to own.

What Do We Need?
Needed is the recapitalization and restructuring of Wall Street, which is bloated from a decade of financial innovation. Needed is the repricing of risk. Needed is a new way for the rating agencies to rate risk, in that they cannot be principals but truly arms-length advisors. Needed is a restoration of faith in the U.S. dollar, which requires a fundamental change of policy in the current and next U.S. administrations. Needed is a boost in the U.S. savings rate, which now sits at zero. Needed is a reduction in the twin U.S. deficits. Needed is more candour from officials and policymakers. Needed is a deleveraging process.

Needed is for the Fed to allow the investment banks to take their losses, support those in need of liquidity, but not assume those losses. While prices will undoubtedly go lower, investors are really looking at a repricing of risk. The markdowns are needed as a discipline. Needed is a change in the accounting rules to reflect mark-to-market losses and the impact on the investment banks' capital. Needed is a reversal of the accounting rules that allowed the banks to leverage up and instead put an emphasis on capital building rather than leverage. Needed are the changes in the impact of securitization that converted illiquid debt into new instruments. Needed is a change in accounting rules for off-balance sheet vehicles.

The United States must also address its continuing problem of too much consumption and its reliance on debt. America’s credit woes come at a time when the rest of world is no longer willing to finance its current account deficits. After a quarter century of wealth creation, Americans have no choice but to work harder, tighten their belts, retire later and save more.
The economic downturn has paved the way for a new sheriff in town. Among the Democrats, one of them is an inspiring orator but both offer no solutions other than hope. Both want a government to spend more, abrogate trade agreements, bail out its institutions and use more government intervention. For a time, Americans enjoyed a free ride on the stock market and housing market. Now they need a leader to solve the country’s problems in new ways, not old ones.

And Finally, Needed is a Role For Gold
Gold cannot be created like fiat currencies or be printed like dollars. At one time, the pound sterling was the world’s reserve currency. It, too, failed. The monetary order is changing again and the dollar as a reserve currency is losing value and influence. In our view, a basket based on gold’s value will go a long way to restore needed liquidity in the markets. Gold is simply the new old currency. Gold hit $1,000 an ounce because the world has been losing confidence in the dollars issued by the Fed.

Gold reached new highs amid tight supply/demand fundamentals, U.S. dollar weakness, investment buying and, equally important, the lack of faith in dollar assets. Gold has doubled in euro and yen terms since 2005. Investor demand is at a record, led by China, which has consumed more gold than India and United States combined. Meantime, supplies have been constrained as South Africa, the second largest producer, has curtailed its production due to a lack of power. China holds only about 600 tons or less than one per cent of its total reserves in gold. With reserves of $1.7 trillion, China will inevitably diversify part of those holdings into gold.

But most important, gold is a global currency that will become the “go to” asset class as the foundation for the global currency system falters due to the protracted credit crisis. Gold will go higher as long as America’s solution to its debt crisis is to pile more debt upon debt, further debasing the dollar. America will, in effect, default on its obligations, either through currency debasement or inflation. Gold has no counterparty risk and no risk of default. This bull market has just begun. We see gold more than doubling to $2,500 an ounce. Gold is the ultimate “currency” and the inevitable store of value and medium of exchange. When George W. Bush was sworn in as president, gold was at $265 an ounce. This month, gold traded at $1,030 an ounce. In essence, the U.S. dollar has been devalued by more than 100 per cent in almost eight years of his presidency. Will the next president do any better?

JWR Adds: For the second half of this article, including John Ing's specific investing recommendations, see Gold-Eagle.com

« Odds 'n Sods: |Main| Letter Re: Deep Family Roots Versus "Ideal Location" When Considering Relocation »

Tuesday March 25 2008

Two Letters Re: Some Offshore Retreat Considerations, by P. Traveler

James,

I see a lot of letters concerning 're-locating' out of the U.S. What are these people thinking? If there is one country that still has a modicum of privacy, freedom, and the ability to 'disappear' into the wilderness, then it is here in the U.S. Where in the world can you own the variety and quantity of firearms than here? [Where else can you] stockpile food, go off the grid et cetera? The legal system is still intact here as well, so you can win in court under most circumstances. I just cant figure Americans willing to give up this uniquely free country for some Third World gamble in some distant land completely removed from family, friends, heritage and culture. It boggles the mind. - Jason in N. Idaho

 

Jim,

I read with interest the article "Some Offshore Retreat Considerations", by P. Traveler. There was much of value in the article. I hope I can add some information for your readers. My circumstances are that I work and live in a South East Asian country for an International NGO. My background is prior military (paratrooper), Police and Prison service, followed by working as an NGO security officer in Bosnia and Sudan before taking my current post. I have a degree in Risk, Crisis and Disaster Management.

I am also married to a local woman which impacts my survival planning. In Asia you don't just marry a wife. You marry the entire extended family which brings some strengths and weaknesses.

Personally I am in the Jerry Pournelle school of survivalism: Prepared for, but trying to prevent TEOTWAWKI. See [Pournelle's] Foreword to the first edition of "Tappan on Survival" which says, in part:
"'[Mel Tappan] saw civilization as hopelessly doomed. Collapse was inevitable, and the only prudent thing to do was to be prepared for it. I didn't agree then, and I don't now. I think civilization can be saved. Can be. But I won't guarantee it. Be Prepared is a pretty good motto for anybody, scouts or anyone else. And of course there are times when I think Mel was right."

As Pournelle says, being prepared is a good and necessary thing. I would not call myself a retreater. That implies running away.

Quoting from Pournelle again:

"There's only one problem: I don't want to move. I like living in cities. The word 'civilized' originally meant those who can–and do–live in cities, and I happen to care a lot for my civilization. When challenged, I can make a reasoned defense of city life, but I shouldn't have to. I like it here. I don't intend to let the barbarians chase me out, and there's an end to the discussion!"

I have been following survivalism since I read the book 'Starman's Son' by Andre Norton. I did the usual bush survival stuff. I read Larry Dean Olson, Mel Tappan, Dr. Bruce Clayton, Soldier of Fortune [magazine] and American Survival Guide [magazine]. I always had my bugout bag and stores so I could go about my duties in law enforcement without having to worry about the home front. I note that since the 1980's the world has been collapsing so plan for things to go right as well as for things to go wrong. I am alarmed by people (especially on the Peak Oil sites) who tell young people not to go to college because the world is doomed anyway. If I had followed that advice I would be unemployed instead of working in interesting countries around the world. Just study something that is useful in both a collapse situation and in good times.

In Asia the survival unit is the extended family. I am particularly fortunate that the family I have married into is reasonably well educated but still has [native] survival skills. My wife's parents survived a period of auto-genocide despite the fact that my father in law had served on the opposing side during the war. It was family connections that kept him alive. My wife and her older brothers and sisters still know how to live off the land and farm. The younger ones are more of a concern and would have a more difficult time adjusting to a survival situation. They tend to be more interested in mobile phones and karaoke. Having said that, the bulk of the family accepts my arguments for survival precautions and things like food storage. The younger ones think I am a strange foreigner but the parents get it because they have lived survival. In a crisis the young ones still do what their parents tell them!

If you have family (or marry into one) it is almost certainly a bonus.

A few tips you might want to consider.

* In developing countries the medical care is not great. Consider doing a Wilderness EMT [W-EMT] First Responder course before you depart. The training will not be available locally.
* Get skills. They cannot take skills away. People have survived extreme situations with next to nothing.
* Asia is a great place to learn martial arts! [Although there are equally effective trainers in the US, Canada, Australasia and Europe. Still it is kind of fun training in Asia for someone who grew up watching 'Kung Fu' on TV.]
* Get mentally prepared. I would share with your readers the view that religious belief is important. Unlike most of your readers I am a Buddhist, as is my wife. But I follow the warrior view of Buddhism--not aging hippy pacifism which I believe to be immoral (and not really Buddhist).

* Study how the indigenous people survived and how any guerrilla groups operated in the country. If coming to Asia there are some jungle survival schools. (Web search engines are your friend!)
* If coming to Asia read some books about how non-Asians functioned behind the lines [during World War II] against the Japanese such as the Coast Watchers and the OSS/SOE. 'The Jungle is Neutral' By F. Spencer Chapman is a good book to start with.
* The book "The Sovereign Individual" by William Rees-Mogg and Basil Davidson has some strategies for protecting your wealth when overseas.
* Enjoy life. Take precautions, learn defensive skills, medical skills,and so forth. But try not to get a bunker mentality.
* Learn about urban permaculture and food production.
* When researching a country you might want to look at some books about Country Risk such as the 'The J Curve' and spend some time looking around the Carlton University site 'Country Indicators for Foreign Policy'
* Finally, while aimed at NGO security personnel, there are some good resources for people living in developing countries at this web site.

Regards, - Felix D.

« Letter Re: Which .22 Ammo to Store--High Velocity or Subsonic? |Main| Two Letters Re: Using Natural Caves on Private Property »

Monday March 24 2008

Letter Re: Advice on Gold and Silver Coins as a US Dollar Inflation Hedge

Jim,
You recommended that I use Swiss America for some gold purchases, which I did. What would you recommend for bartering purposes exactly, as far as gold and precious metals are concerned? I'm confused by all the "collectors" coins and such which are more expensive. Do you have any specific types of coins that you think would be ideal for trading? I purchased some collector 1 ounce coins for their easy-liquidation (and no tax paper trail on gains) as a hedge against inflation, but I'm looking to get some good barter gold for long-term post-SHTF security (especially now that gold is correcting a little)! Thanks, - Rob A.

JWR Replies: First, I must re-iterate: Get your food storage, water filtration, non-hybrid gardening seed, defensive firearms, and other key logistics squared away before you consider investing any extra funds in precious metals.

As I've written before in both my novel ("Patriots") and in this blog, I consider gold coins too compact a store of wealth to be practical for barter in a post-collapse economy. Circulated pre-1965 mint date US dimes and quarters are both more widely recognized and a more realistic unit of value for day-to-day barter. The current silver-to-gold value ratio is around 54 to 1 (It presently takes 54 ounces of silver to buy one ounce of gold). So there are very few barter transactions for which even 1/10th-ounce gold coins would be appropriate. So I recommend that you budget first for one full $1,000 face value bag of pre-'65 "junk" silver coins for each family member. After you have that in hand, then you might consider buying some 1/2 ounce or 1 ounce gold coins as a long term inflation hedge.

While your silver coins will be useful for barter, the gold coins would be your long term store of wealth, designed to parlay back into tangibles (or perhaps a new specie-backed redeemable currency) on the far side of an economic crisis. As I've written before, I think that the risk of another Federal gold confiscation--like that in the 1930s--is low, so there is no need to buy numismatic coins. Instead, buy low dealer premium Krugerrands, American Eagles, or Canadian Maples Leafs.

« Odds 'n Sods: |Main| Letter Re: Which .22 Ammo to Store--High Velocity or Subsonic? »

Letter Re: Forever Postage Stamps as an Inflation Hedge

Jim,
I read the piece about the Forever stamps. Not a bad idea if you mail things. But why pay face value? Stamp collectors often purchase large quantities of stamps looking for a one or two particular stamp. Usually they sell off the remaining stamps at less than face value. Also, many stamp collectors invested in full sheets of Stamps issued in the 1950s and 1960s, thinking full sheets would appreciate in value (They didn't.) These sheets and other bulk postage can often be found selling at 50% to 90% of face value on eBay.

So, if your readers need a boatload of stamps, and send regular mail often, this may save them some money. Also, I think this is obvious, but remember to factor in shipping as part of total cost. - Bill

« Odds 'n Sods: |Main| Four Letters Re: Use of Force in Retreat Security--Planning for Rules of Engagement »

Sunday March 23 2008

Letter Re: A Machine That Sorts Pennies by Composition

Mr. Rawles,
With a 70 pound weight limit, [USPS] Flat Rate [Priority Mail] boxes can be a fantastic deal, especially for small heavy items, as you mentioned. Up until this month, the two sizes available were 11" x 8.5" x 5.5" and 13.625" x 11.875" x 3.375". They cost $8.95 to send anywhere in the U.S.A. Now there is a third alternative, a larger 12” x 12” x 5-1/2” box that costs $12.95 to send (or $10.95 to an APO/FPO address). This is a real bargain.

I recently shipped a large quantity of these from Arizona to Alaska. Most of them contained quite heavy items, such as reloading lead, hand tools, and rocks. These boxes would have cost up to $50.00 each at regular parcel post rates.

The automatic handling equipment evidently knocks the boxes around. Heavy boxes get beat up a lot more than light boxes. If you ship a heavy box, it should be taped securely as you mentioned. It's a good idea to tape all edges, and to wrap strapping tape around it in at least two directions.[JWR Adds: Be sure to cover any strapping tape with a couple of layers of opaque tape or Priority Mail tape, since strapping tape is discouraged by the USPS, for fear that it might gum up their automated parcel handling equipment.] You can ask the clerk to mark it "heavy" and sometimes they'll run it through their strapping machine.

Incidentally, you can buy postage for Flat Rate Boxes online and just estimate the weight since you aren't paying by weight anyway. Then you can have the carrier pick it up at your house. - K.L. - Alaska

« Odds 'n Sods: |Main| Letter Re: "Ark" Storage Food Buckets as Sam's Club (and formerly at COSTCO) »

Saturday March 22 2008

Letter Re: A Machine That Sorts Pennies by Composition

Sir:
Referring to your comment about sorting pennies in your post about nickels: "At present, sorting pennies simply isn't worth your time. Although I suppose that if someone were to invent an automated density-measuring penny sorting machine, he could make a fortune. As background: The pre-1983 pennies presently have a base metal value of about $0.0226 each.) Starting in 1983, the mint switched to 97.5% zinc pennies that are just flashed with copper. Those presently have a base metal value of about $0.0071 each."

A penny sorting machine has been developed by a member of the Gold Is Money information community. He goes by the name Ryedale. This machine automatically sorts the pennies into two piles according to composition. [It sorts out the earlier pre-1982 [95%] copper pennies from the newer copper-flashed zinc pennies.] It is exceedingly accurate and the cost isn’t too bad. It can process 3000 pennies in 10 minutes.

There is also another machine out there than can do hundreds of thousands of pennies at a time (from giant hoppers) in a very short span of time, but it is a commercial machine and costs about $10,000 apiece. Contact another member of Gold Is Money (member name SLV) if interested in learning more. - Ramsey

JWR Replies: Unfortunately, it is presently illegal to melt pennies for scrap. But I suspect that now that it has been more than 25 years since they were last minted, the restriction on melting copper pennies might be lifted.

Even with pre-1982 pennies now worth nearly 2.4 cents, it is still not very economical to launch a business sorting and re-selling pennies. Just to pay for the cost of a coin sorting machine, you would have to sort out and sell more than 1,800 rolls of all copper pennies. Once the value of the dollar drops to the pont that pennies are worth more than four times their face value, then this might become a profitable venture for someone with a good strong back and plenty of secure storage space. Keep in mind that just one $50 bag of copper pennies (5,000 pieces) weighs just a hair over 34 pounds. A $50 bag of the newer debased zinc pennies weighs just over 30 pounds. Ideally, someone could take advantage of the US Mail's "Flat Rate Box" available for Priority Mail. These have no weight limit! So it is conceivable that someone could use sturdy canvas bags inside these boxes